Originally posted by oracleslave
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Dividend cock-up
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Dividend cock-up"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostI like to ask the question... At what point do people give up counting the dividends they take out in order to avoid the extra tax? What income do you need to not care?
Leave a comment:
-
I like to ask the question... At what point do people give up counting the dividends they take out in order to avoid the extra tax? What income do you need to not care?
Leave a comment:
-
If you void a payment in your accounts software it should still show up, it will just be voided.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by salaryman View PostFair enough. Question remains, what should I classify them as.
My accountant has said I should class them as a Director Loan after all. Even though the amount is > £5000 he says, "I think taking into account the shortness of the loan and the fact this was not a deliberate ruse to take money away from the revenue, I cant see there being a problem."
So there you go. I'd personally prefer to classify them as a mistake somehow, but my accounting software doesn't support that.
As others have said, just record it in the books as a directors loan + and - and stop worrying.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostYou would be better off recording it in your accounting software if you can, otherwise if HMRC do a review and see transactions in your bank that don't appear in the accounts they may decide to do a full audit rather than a quick review.
My accountant has said I should class them as a Director Loan after all. Even though the amount is > £5000 he says, "I think taking into account the shortness of the loan and the fact this was not a deliberate ruse to take money away from the revenue, I cant see there being a problem."
So there you go. I'd personally prefer to classify them as a mistake somehow, but my accounting software doesn't support that.
Leave a comment:
-
You would be better off recording it in your accounting software if you can, otherwise if HMRC do a review and see transactions in your bank that don't appear in the accounts they may decide to do a full audit rather than a quick review.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ardesco View PostYou should be able to void the transaction somehow. If not I assume they have a helpdesk you can call who can sort it our for you.
I guess if that happens I'll just explain that it was a payment made in error which was transferred right back. Can't say fairer than that, no?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by salaryman View PostI hear you and I'll consider this for sure. Actually, the accounting software I use (FreeAgent Central) doesn't actually let me classify transactions made in error. Hmmm.
I have -- I'm still waiting for them to respond!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis View PostI'd just put in my accounts
Divended -£3K
Cheque written in error -£7K
Correction of error above +£7K
I have been overpaid and underpaid by agencies. I would be amazed if you had to start playing around with Director's Loans just to sort out this issue. Plus if you have a loan of >£5K it becomes a BIK. Surely this is way over the top. Just correct the mistake and make an appropriate note in your accounts.
Plus ... why not ask your accountant what he/she recommends?!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by salaryman View PostThis is what I'd like to do, but in the accounts you still have to classify each of these transactions. In your scenario, what would I classify the £10K going out as, and what would I classify the £7K coming back in as, since neither of these transactions relates to the actual £3K dividend amount?
It seems to me that the simplest thing to do is classify the £10K out as a Director Loan, repay the £10K which is classified as a Repayment of Director Loan, then just pay the £3K dividend.
I could be wrong though!
Divended -£3K
Cheque written in error -£7K
Correction of error above +£7K
I have been overpaid and underpaid by agencies. I would be amazed if you had to start playing around with Director's Loans just to sort out this issue. Plus if you have a loan of >£5K it becomes a BIK. Surely this is way over the top. Just correct the mistake and make an appropriate note in your accounts.
Plus ... why not ask your accountant what he/she recommends?!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI would just pay the money back (can you cancel it if it hasn't arrived in your personal account yet?), and tear up the dividend declaration.
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostMistakes happen. Classing it as a director's loan for .004% of a year (that's 4 hours) seems incredibly anal and it would be silly if you got into trouble because of it. It's not like there's been any net gain.
Leave a comment:
-
I would just pay the money back (can you cancel it if it hasn't arrived in your personal account yet?), and tear up the dividend declaration.
Mistakes happen. Classing it as a director's loan for .004% of a year (that's 4 hours) seems incredibly anal and it would be silly if you got into trouble because of it. It's not like there's been any net gain.
But IANAA.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis View PostThis sounds very complicated to me. Personally I would just pay back the £7,000 and record the dividend as £3,000. If HMRC investigate then tell them the truth, that an administrative error meant that a cheque was written for the wrong amount. It was spotted and corrected. Surely HMRC don't expect people to never make a mistake. Correcting it with loans just seems to be making the situation worse in my opinion.
It seems to me that the simplest thing to do is classify the £10K out as a Director Loan, repay the £10K which is classified as a Repayment of Director Loan, then just pay the £3K dividend.
I could be wrong though!Last edited by salaryman; 4 March 2008, 16:21.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: