• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Management of Occupational Road Risk!"

Collapse

  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    That depends upon whether you ticked the 'including business mileage' box on your car insurance and paid the higher premium. Many people don't.
    If you are with DirectLine then it doesn't cost nay more.

    Leave a comment:


  • XLMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by IR35 Avoider View Post
    I don't think this is routine health and safey, I think this has come up because of recent court case where after an accident a company was held responsible for the state of its workers cars. Can't remember any of the details.
    There was a survey by the FSB a couple of months back that found something like 60% of employees drive on company business without appropriate insurance - and highlighted the fact that the employer has a duty of care to ensure that employees have suitable cars and insurance cover. I think this may be the trigger for all this sudden interest in the issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ian
    replied
    Do you ever give any of the permies a lift in your car to the other sites? If so, they could argue they are only looking after their own staff.

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35 Avoider
    replied
    I don't think this is routine health and safey, I think this has come up because of recent court case where after an accident a company was held responsible for the state of its workers cars. Can't remember any of the details.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimjamuk
    replied
    well steering well clear of this request - just going to ignore it and see if anyone askes me directly - will argue the toss then

    Leave a comment:


  • Bluebird
    replied
    It's probably just a general circular that the PM doesn't realise that he doesn't have to get contractors to do.

    You know what PMs are like - anything HR they cc to the world and his dog...

    Leave a comment:


  • Kylie4485
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    It could possibly be an indicator of a disguised employee, though, which is dangerous.

    If you are using an umbrella, or are IR35 caught, then there's nothing to be gained by not giving them what they ask for.
    yes I see what you mean for those who are operating Ltd comp. Its just a bit of a pain in the behind for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    It could possibly be an indicator of a disguised employee, though, which is dangerous.

    If you are using an umbrella, or are IR35 caught, then there's nothing to be gained by not giving them what they ask for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kylie4485
    replied
    Just from a personal point of view thats all, anything for an easy life.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Kylie4485 View Post
    wouldn't it just be easier to photocopy the documents.
    Possibly, but this is a requirement for the client to check their employees. Are they asking the Royal Mail delivery person, or their cleaners to prove that they are insured to get to site? If not, then it's none of their business!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kylie4485
    replied
    oh thats what its about then naughty people

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by Kylie4485 View Post
    wouldn't it just be easier to photocopy the documents.
    That depends upon whether you ticked the 'including business mileage' box on your car insurance and paid the higher premium. Many people don't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kylie4485
    replied
    wouldn't it just be easier to photocopy the documents.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Tell him you don't drive for his company business. You have already passed a full inspection by your employer, and can get a director to warrant that this has been done.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimjamuk
    started a topic Management of Occupational Road Risk!

    Management of Occupational Road Risk!

    ello,

    got a mail this morning from the manager on my project which condenses down to

    "I need to take a responsible approach towards anyone that drives on company business for Health & Safety reasons. This means checking that you have a valid licence and the car(s) that you use to travel on company business are properly insured etc. Please can you provide me with photocopies of your driving licence plus M.O.T. certificate(s) and insurance certificate(s) for any vehicle(s) that you use to travel on company business"

    Based out of one site but need to go to a different site maybe 3-4 times a month. Use my own car and claim mileage through Ltd.

    I'm thinking they can stuff that request where the sun dont shine - BUT anyone else had this or seen it???? F H&S brigade again
Working...
X