Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I've been doing the PM role for about a year now and my current contract takes me past Xmas so I presume its not new work as such.
But I've never had any formal PM training, just picked it up as I've gone from being a developer to team lead developer through to PM (a long journey). I think the Prince2 methodology will be a big help especially as most of the other PM's already have it (not coming from a development background).
For owner managed companies, if the skills learned are allowing you to obtain a new form of work (rather than updating existing knowledge) then the costs are disallowed.
Allowable though for employees.
So if you are within IR35, your client should pay for your training?
For owner managed companies, if the skills learned are allowing you to obtain a new form of work (rather than updating existing knowledge) then the costs are disallowed.
Allowable though for employees.
It would be interesting to argue one way or the other. For example, I did some DBA training this year, and expensed it. I'm not a DBA, and never have been, BUT I did some DBA training many years back with Oracle. So, did I do training that allowed me to obtain a new form of work, or was I just updating existing knowledge?
For owner managed companies, if the skills learned are allowing you to obtain a new form of work (rather than updating existing knowledge) then the costs are disallowed.
Yes to both. Of course it's a business expense: you're doing the training wholly in the interests of your business. (If you were learning cookery or falconry it might be a different story.)
Leave a comment: