Originally posted by richy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Giant tie in query
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Giant tie in query"
Collapse
-
the issue came up because the contractor employed by giant wanted to work direct for the end-client. and agency was "going after" giant, so giant was "going after" said employee trying to escape and work direct at the client.. with all the "acrimony" designed to worry the contractor and the end-client into not cutting out the agency from the equation. If all that makes sense...!?Originally posted by Lewis View PostI can understand an agency having a tie-in but not giant. Is this new? Loads of people left powerhouse around April with no issues.
Leave a comment:
-
I can understand an agency having a tie-in but not giant. Is this new? Loads of people left powerhouse around April with no issues.Originally posted by MetromaniacThis is from Giant's terms:
"13. POST TERMINATION RESTRICTIONS
13.1 You hereby agree that you shall not (without the prior consent in writing of the Company) for a period of 6 months immediately following the termination of your employment with the Company, indirectly or directly or through an agency or otherwise and whether on your own behalf or in conjunction with or on behalf of any other person, firm, company or other organisation, (and whether as an employee, director, principal, agent, consultant or in any other capacity whatsoever), (a) be employed or engaged in, or (b) perform services in respect of, or (c) be otherwise concerned with the Customer for whom you were carrying out an Assignment, provided always that the provisions of this clause 13.1 shall apply only in respect of Services with which you were either personally concerned or for which you were responsible whilst employed by the Company during the 12 months immediately preceding the termination of your employment."
Is it normal for an umbrella company to try to regulate the possibilities of employment?
Leave a comment:
-
This is from Giant's terms:Originally posted by Let-Me-Inhahaha,,,,you beat me to it!!!
"13. POST TERMINATION RESTRICTIONS
13.1 You hereby agree that you shall not (without the prior consent in writing of the Company) for a period of 6 months immediately following the termination of your employment with the Company, indirectly or directly or through an agency or otherwise and whether on your own behalf or in conjunction with or on behalf of any other person, firm, company or other organisation, (and whether as an employee, director, principal, agent, consultant or in any other capacity whatsoever), (a) be employed or engaged in, or (b) perform services in respect of, or (c) be otherwise concerned with the Customer for whom you were carrying out an Assignment, provided always that the provisions of this clause 13.1 shall apply only in respect of Services with which you were either personally concerned or for which you were responsible whilst employed by the Company during the 12 months immediately preceding the termination of your employment."
Is it normal for an umbrella company to try to regulate the possibilities of employment?
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Leave them... and that a document they printed and posted to the agency with 12 month tie in is valid. I've not signed this document they printed... all they have is a "web agreement", but they accepted my email confirming I was not tied in at the time (no response received).Originally posted by LewisWhat are the saying you cannot do?
It's basically a contractual issue I guess...
Leave a comment:
-
This is why I say time and time AGAIN!!
Giant is goind down the hills and far away!!
Leave a comment:
-
What are the saying you cannot do?Originally posted by richyAnyone else with Giant?
I made sure I confirmed I didn't agree to any of Giant's tie in terms and didn't opt out of the Employment agency regulations, but now they're claiming I have accepted them.
I still have the email I sent to them confirming that I did not opt out, and did not accept tie in periods and would be working with the same clients immediately.
Any thoughts? thx richy
Leave a comment:
-
Giant tie in query
Anyone else with Giant?
I made sure I confirmed I didn't agree to any of Giant's tie in terms and didn't opt out of the Employment agency regulations, but now they're claiming I have accepted them.
I still have the email I sent to them confirming that I did not opt out, and did not accept tie in periods and would be working with the same clients immediately.
Any thoughts? thx richyTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: