Originally posted by ConsummatePedant
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Share (Mis?)Allocation - Cock-up or Conspiracy?"
Collapse
-
Nice guess but on this occasion, no, they didn't rename a previously registered company. It was just that the agents had registered themselves as director, secretary and shareholder and then transferred rights to me for reasons of expediency.
Maybe I should have registered myself via the online process. I wonder if this is straightforward...
Will that be Brains SA?
Leave a comment:
-
Probably what it was that the company you used bought a "company" of the shelf - that is to say the company already existed with the one share.
When you came along, the company dorectors resigned, the shares transferred and the name changed.
Some see this easier than going thriugh Co House to register a new company - although it truth with on-line incorporation you don't need to do that these days....
Leave a comment:
-
I spoke to my accountant who confirmed that it was a legitimate part of the set up procedure.
That one share (or "subscriber share") has already been transfered to me and the record of the transfer has been lodged with Companies House.
Thx again for the advice. Err, am I supposed to say something like "You guys rock!!!" (is that enough exclamation marks) and add a suitable emoticon? Maybe this one?
Leave a comment:
-
Thx for the advice; I feel a lot more relaxed about it now - but obviously will sort it out on Monday.
Leave a comment:
-
Gonzo is right - the person named is almost certainly the formation agent - he will probably also be shown as the first director as well as shareholder. We will almost certainly have provided a signed share transfer form and signed resignation as director together with certificate of non trading. This is all normal stuff and nothing to worry about - it's the standard way of avoiding the "real" shareholders/directors (i.e. you) from having to make sworn declarations in front of solicitor and delays in getting signed documents from you. Just confirm this is the case by phoning your accountant and make sure you see the documents he has signed to extract himself from your company.
Leave a comment:
-
Kind of depends what happens to that share.
It is not unusual for company formation agents to own the shares when the company is formed but they will be transferred to you immediately.
I wouldn't worry about screwing up - with that nickname you will fit right in here provided that you live up to it
Leave a comment:
-
Share (Mis?)Allocation - Cock-up or Conspiracy?
My accountant (based near Birmingham) who I have used reliably for the past six years has just set up a new private limited company for me. He uses an agency based in London.
My company's Memorandum of Association arrived yesterday. The company is divided into 1000 shares (as requested) but one share has been allocated to some bloke in Kent! I am guessing (hoping) that this is an administrative error and can be sorted out on Monday.
However, could it be that the agency who registered the company are "pulling a fast one"? Or is it possible that it's a legitimate part of the set up procedure and that share will be transferred back to me?
I am starting a new contract on Monday 2nd April so I hope that this can be resolved within the week otherwise I'll have to look at alternatives to allow me to invoice my customer; perhaps joining an umbrella company.
Advice/suggestions/similar experiences welcomed.
[This is my first posting apologies if I screw up]Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
- Business Account with ANNA Money Nov 1 15:51
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 14:11
- How Autumn Budget 2024 affects homes, property and mortgages Oct 31 09:23
Leave a comment: