Originally posted by wettowel
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Post-reform IR35 accountability question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Post-reform IR35 accountability question"
Collapse
-
You are missing several things, yes. The first thing is that contractual liability clauses are common in nominally outside IR35 contracts under Chapter 10 and purport to transfer the liability from the supply chain above the contractor (Fee Payer, in the first instance) to the contractor's company. The second thing is that, in HMRC's opinion, were a liability to arise, the liability could simply be passed down the chain, presumably meaning either through these liability clauses or, ultimately, a correction to PAYE (i.e., directly to the contractor, in the same way an employer can correct PAYE errors, retrospectively). Whether these things would ultimately succeed is debatable, but they exist as concerns. I personally wouldn't touch an outside IR35 contract under Chapter 10 (~ UK clients in general), which is the desired end result.
-
Post-reform IR35 accountability question
Hi there, please forgive me if this seems like a question that has been done to death, but there seems to be a lot of conflicting information floating around and I was hoping someone will be able to provide me with simple, straight-forward answer.
Putting aside the damage the preform did to the contracting market, speaking strictly from a legal responsibility point of view, it should be a welcome change for the contractor at least, right? My understanding is that the responsibility of the IR35 status determination and the consequences for getting it wrong have been shifted from the contractor to the HMRC, meaning that should HMRC open an inquiry into a contract, the contractor would not be liable for anything. Or am I missing something here? Can HMRC still go after the contractor with the new rules?
Thanks for your input.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: