Re: My scheme
Fairy snuff.
Just from a previous conversation I thought you were using a scheme which invested in an EIS (qualifying you for relief upto 100k) and then unwound the EIS a way down the track to generate your income.
Still, listening properly has never been my strong point.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: PayScheme+
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "PayScheme+"
Collapse
-
Guest replied
-
Guest repliedRe: My scheme
What's EIS?
I am still with Payscheme+
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedMy scheme
Bex,
What went wrong with the EIS approach (or am I confused again?)
I
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Offshore Loans
Hi,
No, we will always complete your VAT and PAYE for you.
I can understand how some of these schemes are so tempting, but remember the Dignatio fiasco?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Offshore Loans
Simon
Thanks for your reply. I will drop you an email over the weekend.
I may have got the monthly figure wrong. But is it your expectation that I sould be filling out my own vat forms, and PAYE/NIC books? I don't have a major problem with your service it just appears that all other contractors are doing is sending in a copy of each monthly invoice and everything is handled. When things like Payscheme+ are mentioned with talk of 90% take home and no admin - the eyes do light up.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Offshore Loans
just normal accountants - owned by Simon Dolan i think. Standard Self-Employed scheme - ie they do very little.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Offshore Loans
who's SJD and what scheme have they got for you?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Offshore Loans
Hi Underscore,
I was surprised to read what you said. We charge £80 a month, not £85, and do the VAT returns, PAYE, payroll etc as part of the package. You don't have to do it yourself.
Please do drop me an email re the other advice as is not something we would say ordinarily.
simon@sjdaccountancy.com
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOffshore Loans
Firm of accountants, similar to us. No scheme as such, just a standard limited company set up.who's SJD and what scheme have they got for you?
We looked at these schemes and their conditions and concluded that they were very risky and wouldn't stand up to an indepth enquiry.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Offshore Loans
I'm actually with SJD - who get 85 per month from me and appear to do very little for that. I have to fill out all my VAT returns, my quart PAYE/NIC, and they tell me to hold on to 40% of my cash "just incase" they can't get the tax bill down? It just doesn;t fill me with confidence - I should be able to pay these people tell them what I'm pulling in and leave it all to them.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedIt is dodgy but the odds may mean you don't get looked at and get away with it. I think these schemes came into existence for City types who are dealing in much bigger numbers, have more cash to fight it when they are caught and are not doing it long term so risk it.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOffshore Loans
I seem to recall that these types of scheme were torn to shreads by both myself & Simon Dolan approx 12 months back. :x
In addition, they were specifically mentioned in the finance bill last year as schemes that are being identified and shut down. The comments on the tax web link I think indicate someone else's opinion on these in a similar way.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedIt must be dodgy. They reckon I can take home 90%. Why aren't all contractors doing this.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedyes I went with it and as rootsnall said, it's OK as long as the interpretation of non-employment-related loans doesn't change - because basically that's what makes it tax-free
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedHave a look at www.taxationweb.co.uk/forum/discuss.php?id=5775. It doesn't sound too bad but its like other schemes, its OK if you don't get investigated and lose.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Today 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10

Leave a comment: