If you are advising the client in the form a report, you could sign it on behalf of the company rather than as an individual, therefore the client is being advised by a representative of the company instead of you as an individual.
To cover your back within the company, could you state your opinion at a minuted meeting? Your view would then be officially recorded.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Media Development
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Media Development"
Collapse
-
Guest replied
-
Guest repliedYour correct in saying that DRM is not required legally. However I have been employed to advise the client as well as build the system, therefore I need to cover my own back, should the client suggest that I didn't advise them correctly.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedI don't get it - how are you liable for anything? If your manager tells you to write a site that legally supplies music without DRM, then that's his business. Besides which, it's not illegal to have music without DRM. DRM is the spawn of satan.
Leave a comment:
-
Media Development
Hi
I'm currently contracting for a SME, who have been asked by a client to develop an online music system. Problem is the crowd I'm contracting for have advised the client not to pursue any rights management, despite myself and another contractor advised them to implement some sort of rights management.
Question is where do I stand legally, especially given the amount of news in the media about private prosecutions. I think I'm going to ask the crowd I work for to sign a disclaimer, stating that I have advised them to offer a rights management solution and they have chosen to advise the client differently.
Would this suffice ?
Any advise would be appreciated
Cheers
MicksterTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Today 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Yesterday 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Yesterday 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Jun 30 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Jun 22 05:47

Leave a comment: