Re: Clauses
Standard stuff for a B2B contract.
Welcome to the world of being in business, except for IR35 of course.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Problems with Liability clause
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Problems with Liability clause"
Collapse
-
Guest replied
-
Guest repliedPI
And you may find the management company are carrying PI for you, ask the question.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedxserret
your understanding of these clauses is incorrect.
In what way is a requirement for an act to be 'negligent' "out of your control"?
You are selling yourself as an 'expert' consultant. It is 100% correct that the hiring company should expect you to provide such a warrenty for your work.
If you want the easy life of an employee become a permi, otherwise get yourself some PI insurance.
Tim
Leave a comment:
-
Problems with Liability clause
I’m first timer and was shock to read the clauses below in two different contract drafts. I would say that if I signing the first one I will be incurring unlimited liability on risk out of my control.
The second model is better, but still scary, specially point (iii)
What amazes me even further is that a typical software license agreement disclaims all liability.
“The CONSULTANT hereby indemnifies the MANAGEMENT COMPANY against all claims, costs, damages, loss and or liabilities, which may arise from the performance or nonperformance of the IT SERVICES to be provided by the CONSULTANT or from any negligent or unlawful act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
The Management Company reserves the right to call for insurance for such indemnity.”
“The Contractor shall be held liable towards the Client for damage to persons and damage to goods which are the consequence of (i) any defect of the material and/or software used by the Contractor, (ii) any shortcoming of the Contractor to its obligations under this Agreement or (iii) any fault or negligence of the Contractor in the performance of the Agreement.”
Does anybody else find the text in these clauses unacceptable as well?
Thanks,Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: