• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Invoices For Expenses When Inside IR35"

Collapse

  • Wary
    replied
    Originally posted by tarbera View Post
    And did you pay these incurred expenses personally or via company credit card?

    Just as a side note, who declared this contract inside IR35?
    1) Personally
    2) Me (based on my working practices)

    Leave a comment:


  • ContrataxLtd
    replied
    Originally posted by Wary View Post
    They should have been aware as I actually e-mailed my accountant in April 2016 to inform him that these occasional trips (with the occasional overnight stay) were not to my usual place of work, to check that I'm still OK to claim these despite the change in rules ... to which he confirmed I can.

    The overnight subsistence claims probably averaged less than one a month (for typically 1 or 2 nights a claim), so these clearly weren't for my usual place of work.
    I'd expect your accountant to be able to correct this pretty easily then, it is a bit of work to do the recalculations and necessary adjustments but it's in your favour to get this done as you will have overpaid HMRC and been underpaid yourself.

    I have assumed this isn't a public sector contract given the fact your company is still being paid Gross.

    Martin
    Contratax Ltd

    Leave a comment:


  • tarbera
    replied
    Originally posted by Wary View Post
    Apologies. No, the agency just pay the monthly gross invoices into the company account. My accountants run the payroll.
    And did you pay these incurred expenses personally or via company credit card?

    Just as a side note, who declared this contract inside IR35?

    Leave a comment:


  • Glencky
    replied
    That quote from when you raised the concern is so pertinent. That guy was just completely incorrect. I think it's Serious Complaint time. I assume you've got that in an email since you've quoted it like that? In which case it's pretty clear-cut - and very bad for them

    I was on my phone when I replied last night so didn't bother getting a link but here are the steps in the Deemed Employment Calculation. It's in Step 3 that you get the deduction for allowable expenses;

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-c...oyment-payment

    If you were a permie employee based at Office A with occasional travel to Office B, Office B travel would be an allowable expense. The calculation is really quite simple and how the accountant screwed this up I don't know. But as I've said, sadly my experience is that one major chain accountancy firm and one small contractor specialist I have had personally recommended, have consistently failed to understand IR35 properly and service my needs properly operating inside IR35. I don't want to slate all accountants, which would be wrong. But IMHO what's going on here is we are operating in a market still saturated (though changing obviously, thanks to the public sector rule changes) with people operating outside, which means more risk of accountants missing something when you're inside. Even though this in particular is SO bleedin' simple.

    But on the positive side, seems like you are going to be able to correct it, or rather they are. I think best way is to approach them with the evidence of their mess-ups and let them sort it out with HMRC, and eventually it'll work its way through to a rebate or you clawing it back over time (I assume).

    Leave a comment:


  • Wary
    replied
    Originally posted by tarbera View Post
    No I meant your monthly invoice not your expenses.

    Did agent run your payroll ?
    Apologies. No, the agency just pay the monthly gross invoices into the company account. My accountants run the payroll.

    Leave a comment:


  • tarbera
    replied
    Originally posted by Wary View Post
    I have to invoice the agency for the gross amount as shown on the receipts (can't add VAT on top of this) and this is what they reimburse. So I was already aware that I'm losing out on these expenses due to being on Flat VAT, but didn't realise until later that I was also losing out due to them treating these as non-qualifying.
    No I meant your monthly invoice not your expenses.

    Did agent run your payroll ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wary
    replied
    Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View Post
    I'm presuming that this is because the accountant wasn't aware that the travel was 'one off' type travel to places other than your main place of work.
    They should have been aware as I actually e-mailed my accountant in April 2016 to inform him that these occasional trips (with the occasional overnight stay) were not to my usual place of work, to check that I'm still OK to claim these despite the change in rules ... to which he confirmed I can.

    The overnight subsistence claims probably averaged less than one a month (for typically 1 or 2 nights a claim), so these clearly weren't for my usual place of work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wary
    replied
    Originally posted by tarbera View Post
    are you being paid NET by your agent, or getting the gross invoice amount and then paying it all out as caught under IR35?
    I have to invoice the agency for the gross amount as shown on the receipts (can't add VAT on top of this) and this is what they reimburse. It is this amount (minus the flat VAT & 5%) which goes into the salary calculation. So I was already aware that I'm losing out on these expenses due to being on Flat VAT, but didn't realise until more recently that I was also losing out due to them treating these as non-qualifying.
    Last edited by Wary; 16 February 2018, 11:55.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wary
    replied
    Thanks all for the responses. Unfortunately the main amount relates to 2016/17 for which the accounts have been filed. Alas this could have been nipped in the bud when they were still in the draft stage as I did question it with the guy who prepared these accounts, saying this didn't seem right. His response "It does seem very restrictive and potentially unfair I can see that, however due to HMRC tightening their grip on all things IR35, there are very few qualifying IR35 expenses these days which can be deducted when calculating your salary. It is pretty much just down to pension contributions, childcare and professional indemnity insurance. Everything else has to come out of the 5% ..."

    Leave a comment:


  • Glencky
    replied
    Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View Post
    In theory this should be correctable, the March 2017 salary could be recalculated to take into account the allowable travel costs and an earlier year update sent to HMRC to advise them of this. Depending on your year end amended accounts/CT600 may have to be prepared too.
    That's interesting - I know it wasn't my query but still interesting and potentially helpful for me too.

    Leave a comment:


  • ContrataxLtd
    replied
    Originally posted by Wary View Post
    Thanks for the latest info. Looks like my accountants have messed up big-style.

    Won't name names at this stage but they're one of the big-boys. This goes back to at least the beginning of 2016/17.

    What course of action do I have to be put back into the position in which I would now be if it had been done correctly? ... either via HMRC if possible or compensation from the accountants? Thanks
    I'm presuming that this is because the accountant wasn't aware that the travel was 'one off' type travel to places other than your main place of work. I am assuming this because the rules changed where as previously all travel to a temporary location was allowable and now it is only allowable to places other than your main place of work (deemed permanent under IR35).

    In theory this should be correctable, the March 2017 salary could be recalculated to take into account the allowable travel costs and an earlier year update sent to HMRC to advise them of this. Depending on your year end amended accounts/CT600 may have to be prepared too. Current year is easy to correct, just do this in the February or March payroll run depending on how your salary is calculated each period.

    HTH

    Martin
    Contratax Ltd

    Leave a comment:


  • tarbera
    replied
    question

    are you being paid NET by your agent, or getting the gross invoice amount and then paying it all out as caught under IR35?

    Leave a comment:


  • Glencky
    replied
    I think you've got a snowball's chance in hell of getting 'compensation' from the accountants. You could sue them, but from my (limited, admittedly) understanding there's a very limited chance of you getting anything out of them, and if you did it'd take a lot of time, effort and hassle for what I assume isn't a massive amount of money - I mean, how much do you have in travelling expenses? Even when I was in Dublin for a client pretty much every other week, the tax on it wouldn't have been that massive. Certainly way bigger than I want to lose, particularly when paying somebody professional fees not to screw up, but equally not necessarily enough to live my life fighting a losing battle for a long time over.

    As far as correcting with HMRC is concerned, I'm genuinely not sure. Given you've overpaid tax here, once you've checked it out thoroughly and confirmed 100% that this is what has happened, you could do worse than to call HMRC for advice. Or perhaps one of the accountants on here (I'm not one, I just have experience of operating within IR35 with cr@p accountants so I learned a lot more than I otherwise would have done!) might enlighten.

    The problem I see that is even bigger than HMRC is that your accounts filed with Companies House will also be wrong for that year...

    EDIT: and what I should have said is that all my interactions with accountants since becoming a contractor have merely served to emphasise the point that it doesn't matter who you get professional advice or help from, the legal buck stops with you... and we do well to remember this. So many contractors - this BBC presenter who's just got stung on IR35 for example - seem to just rely on what the professional says, even when the professional is talking out of their arse...
    Last edited by Glencky; 16 February 2018, 10:52. Reason: update

    Leave a comment:


  • Wary
    replied
    Thanks for the latest info. Looks like my accountants have messed up big-style.

    Won't name names at this stage but they're one of the big-boys. This goes back to at least the beginning of 2016/17.

    What course of action do I have to be put back into the position in which I would now be if it had been done correctly? ... either via HMRC if possible or compensation from the accountants? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Glencky
    replied
    Belatedly... almost what Malvolio said. Accountancy is part of the 5% but expenses like T and S are not. If you search for HMRC's dowbloadable excel Deemed Employment Calculator / IR35 spreadsheet it'll help you see the calc.

    If your accountant has been treating other office travel / subsistence as part of the 5% they are wrong. Think about it like this : you would quickly be much worse off than a permie if this were so. People may or may not agree with HMRC's overall stance but it has its logic and fairness. The 5% is where they acknowledge you are not actually an employee and do have a cost of doing business, albeit not a large one. That 5% covers e.g. accountancy, stationery, Companies House etc. The allowable expenses follow same rules as for permies in equivalent position so in your examples are not taxable as they would also not be for permies, hence taken off also. Ditto pension cobts. Then the residue is full tax and NI. It is actually quite easy to understand once you think of it like that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X