Contract
What if the client refuses to sign the time sheet??
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Contract Termination - PROBLEM!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contract Termination - PROBLEM!!"
Collapse
-
Guest replied
-
Guest repliedHmmmmm
If you have a signed timesheet then legally the agency have to stump up. It would be illegal to withold funds but you may have to go via the small claims to get the dosh.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedcontract
Via an agency, he has phoned me a few times and when speaking to me speaks to the contracting division of the company I was contracting for. the company are basically giving reasons that are not true and I can prove it ultimately.....
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedContract
Where you direct with client or via agency?
Leave a comment:
-
Contract Termination - PROBLEM!!
I have a question that someone may be able to help answer....
Until very recently I was in contract that was to be renewed. I did a piece of work as set, but when I submitted it apparently it was "not good enough" and not what was required.... To my understanding it was exactly what was needed.
They terminated the contract straight away. I had a meeting earlier in that week where I drove there, they are using that as another reason as I should have flow, but unbeknown to the one boss I was asked to drive to collect some items from another colleges house. If I had known the work required was different I would never have driven. Unbeknown to the guy who’s house I went to I had a witness who waited around the corner for me, so I can prove he asked me to call to his house.
They are now arguing about paying until the contract termination ie 4 days more, and want me to email a total statement through detailing the above etc. I think I should take legal advice as they may refute some of my claims, but I can prove with my witness that I went to his house and I have all the items he gave me.
They basically are using me as a scapegoat as they got their knuckles rapped and obviously as a contractor I go first, but I object to the way they have done it.
Any advice on the matter greatly appreciated!!Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Leave a comment: