• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "contract advice please"

Collapse

  • pmasoft
    replied
    Option

    If I had a contract saying I had 40 hours over 5 days and the client did not provide anywhere near that then I would say the contract is null and void. If the contract does not say what hours will be required you effectively have zero hours contract.

    So in my humble opinion:

    If the former, terminate the contract for breach of terms.
    If the latter, go get another contract as there is no exclusivity on this type of contract and run the two in parallel if possible...multiple clients is a bonus.

    Leave a comment:


  • bradhilt
    replied
    as i suspected

    thanks guys
    its pretty much what i expected although i was looking for a little glimmer of hope.

    Thanks again

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Unfortunately without knowing what your contract says no one can give you advice especially as some contracts are for adhoc work while others are for continuous days.

    The majority of contracts state you can't bill for days you don't work so your best bet is to fine another contract, be unavailable and offer them a substitute.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Unfortunately, the general rule is: no work, no pay. You should find a clause to that effect in your contract. Beyond what is specifically agreed in the contract in terms of work being provided, they will not be under any obligation to offer work and you will not be under any obligation to accept it. By all means, read through your contract carefully and perhaps call the IPSE legal helpline if you're a member (and if you aren't, you should probably consider it), but this is likely to be the situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • bradhilt
    started a topic contract advice please

    contract advice please

    Hi all
    i am aware that without seeing my contract that this would not be able to be answered to the fullest but i really do not know where to go on this.

    Back in november i secured a contract that seemed as if it would tide me through for a few months. Basically in short what has happened is that the company has been messing me about giving me days here and there as their client is messing them about. Obviously this is not my problem and i just want to work and be paid. Over the past 4 weeks i have only had 3 days work out of them. I am of course now looking for something else but where would i stand in billing them for the time i have not been called in ? my terms are that i am to finish the contract duration but they can terminate at any time. They have not terminated but only sent me a mail saying they can only offer adhoc until their client sorts it out.

    any advice would be appreciated. I dont expect anyone on here to sort my problems out but a push in the right direction would be very helpful.

    Thank you
Working...
X