Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Thank you,
The link helped, and I have forwarded it to my accountant.
As with all these things, common sense and being right have nothing to do with the rationale being applied!
Glad to help OverCoder, let me know if you have any more issues with this.
Personally I think your accountant is being very cautious as the Samadian case does not apply to employees, just the self employed (sole traders, partnerships etc.).
Have a read of the following article from CUK and see what you think then:
You might want to question your accountant on this, based on what you have said I think his/her advice is quite misleading.
Hope this helps
Martin
Contratax Ltd
Thank you,
The link helped, and I have forwarded it to my accountant.
As with all these things, common sense and being right have nothing to do with the rationale being applied!
I contract for a client through my limited company and travel to and from my home (business address) and client site. I claim the standard (45p per mile) travelling allowance for the mileage covered and it is only for business (no personal stops or diversions).
After receiving an email from my accountant detailing that I should no longer claim mileage costs as HMRC won a case against a doctor (did a search for 'doctors mileage case' in google) HMRC vs Samadian, I am in two minds.
What do you see as the percieved risks in continuing (all other conditions - 24 months, business class insurance, etc. are met) to claim?
Has my accountant got a point? And can I be grouped in with Dr Samadian and liable to be a valid target?
If you are an independent contractor operating through your own company then you can still claim the 45p per mile for business travel (up to 10,000 per tax year - 25p per mile thereafter).
As I understand it, this case against the doctor was based on his employment responsibilities and work locations relating to his employment (which were separate to his independent self-employment contracts).
I contract for a client through my limited company and travel to and from my home (business address) and client site. I claim the standard (45p per mile) travelling allowance for the mileage covered and it is only for business (no personal stops or diversions).
After receiving an email from my accountant detailing that I should no longer claim mileage costs as HMRC won a case against a doctor (did a search for 'doctors mileage case' in google) HMRC vs Samadian, I am in two minds.
What do you see as the percieved risks in continuing (all other conditions - 24 months, business class insurance, etc. are met) to claim?
Has my accountant got a point? And can I be grouped in with Dr Samadian and liable to be a valid target?
Hi OverCoder
Personally I think your accountant is being very cautious as the Samadian case does not apply to employees, just the self employed (sole traders, partnerships etc.).
Have a read of the following article from CUK and see what you think then:
I contract for a client through my limited company and travel to and from my home (business address) and client site. I claim the standard (45p per mile) travelling allowance for the mileage covered and it is only for business (no personal stops or diversions).
After receiving an email from my accountant detailing that I should no longer claim mileage costs as HMRC won a case against a doctor (did a search for 'doctors mileage case' in google) HMRC vs Samadian, I am in two minds.
What do you see as the percieved risks in continuing (all other conditions - 24 months, business class insurance, etc. are met) to claim?
Has my accountant got a point? And can I be grouped in with Dr Samadian and liable to be a valid target?
Leave a comment: