• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: AWR

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "AWR"

Collapse

  • Lewis
    replied
    Beaten to it ... http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...mployment.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis
    started a topic AWR

    AWR

    So I got an email with this article this morning: Agency Legislation Will Stifle Self-Employment - Contractor Weekly

    It says that
    From 6 April 2014, a worker must be treated as an employee for Income Tax and National Insurance purposes if the worker
    ...
    personally provides their services to the client
    .... is, or can be, supervised, directed or controlled by someone as to how they do the work
    and

    From 6 April 2014, agencies must be able to prove to HMRC why the worker wasn’t treated as an employee. They will have to work with their client and the worker to get suitable evidence to demonstrate this.

    From 6 July 2015 onwards, agencies will have to send HMRC reports that contain details of all workers and their payments for those they consider to be genuinely self-employed, with penalties applying where reports are late, incomplete or incorrect.
    This all sounds very much like IR35 but the burden now being on the agency to prove the worker is not caught.

    Does the the standard opt-out form get around all this?
Working...
X