• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

This great forum is disintegrating very quickly - here is how to stop it

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I disagree.

    NAT had very good reasons for acting in that way - there were people that were intent on provoking the issue, and I count myself within that group. However, tonight's fun and games is a completely different thing all together.

    FWIW, I have no issue with NAT as a moderator, despite what I said (or implied) in the past.
    Yep - agree with this. As a (mostly) well behaved onlooker, I though NAT was perhaps a little over enthusiastic at the very beginning, but was pushed pretty hard. I don't think he had public spats with other mods, or banned any of them.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by ztt View Post
      mods are really quite 20 century

      legally no mods are the way to go

      and less rules
      The CCNet approach eh - no registration, anonymous posters and top quality banter all day long - & not a bed wetter in sight.
      Now ruined by forced registration and over moderation & a pale shadow of its former self

      There must be a place for an un-restricted forum - or are owners of the infrastructure too risk averse to host such a venue?
      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

      Comment

      Working...
      X