Originally posted by Silverskin
View Post
For example, if we pretend that the disguised remuneration that was taken out of the Finance Bill eventually comes in then:
1. To ensure that a loan that is currently outstanding is not outstanding on 5 April 2019, it has to be repaid with "money". So if you repay it with a loan note, a house, some hay or Apple stock, it will still be outstanding and so you still have to pay the tax/NIC. You can find the draft legislation in Schedules 17 (employees) and 18 (self-employed) of the original Finance (No 2) Bill 2017.
2. The loan also needs to be repaid in a way that means it is really repaid. In other words, on a realistic view of the facts, it needs to be repaid. If it isn't, then the loan will still be outstanding. So smoke and mirrors won't do it. This is just the way that legislation is interpreted.
3. The repayment is ignored if there is "any connection (direct or indirect)" with a tax avoidance arrangement. So if the way of getting the money to pay the loan back, or what you are thinking of doing with the money afterwards, has any connection with a tax avoidance arrangement then the repayment is ignored. This is para 3 of Schedule 17 (or Schedule 18) of the original Finance Bill https://www.publications.parliament....0156/17156.pdf
4. If you were self-employed and the money that the ex-lender now has could benefit you, someone connected with you, someone who used to be connected with you or you have the power to enjoy it (incredibly widely defined) then you will pay tax on the money that the ex-lender now holds. Do a ctrl-F for "23A" in the draft legislation I linked to. This point is self-employed specific though. For someone who was an employee then this tax charge probably does not apply (because of para 57 Sch 2 FA 2011). I say "probably" because we don't have the final version of the legislation. Also, this only applies where the ex-lender got the original funds before 6 April 2011.
The bit about tax avoidance is very important. I've seen people say you could do all sort of things to get out of the legislation (become an employee of the trustee, enter into matching "winning" bet and "losing" derivative contract, etc) but these clearly don't work. And by trying to do this sort of thing you may well be in GAAR (60% penalty), DOTAS (financial products hallmark and/or employment income hallmark), APNs, be liable for the April 2019 loan charge (as the repayment will be ignored), etc. Basically, you will end up paying a load of fees for the avoidance scheme and still have to pay the tax (plus penalties, etc).
But for someone who was an employee, who repays the loan with their own money, originally got the loan before April 2011, has nothing to do with a tax avoidance scheme and does not have open years then there may be no April 2019 tax charge (may, because the final legislation is not here yet). Instead the tax will be paid when you (or pretty much anyone else) gets a benefit (even after your death). You will also remain vulnerable to the "April 2021 leaving money in a trust after repaying the loan tax charge" or whatever might come next.
Comment