Originally posted by Dylan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
HMRC consultation on penalties for scheme developers/marketers
Collapse
X
-
HMRC increased dividend tax, and it will increase again in the future to "simplfy" things, that in itself enough to remove big tax advantage Ltds gave, plus IR35 and other things make it more controllable. -
-
Or maybe they will just retrospectively strengthen IR35 to stop avoidance in that area, "clarify" how it should have worked.Originally posted by AtW View PostHMRC increased dividend tax, and it will increase again in the future to "simplfy" things, that in itself enough to remove big tax advantage Ltds gave, plus IR35 and other things make it more controllable.Comment
-
Indeed Carling
That is where the big pot of money is - retro Ltd Co action via the increased divs perhaps to address the IR35 omnishambles
Be good if Webberg could give his opinion in due course on this new developmentComment
-
Was wondering that. How will QDos / IPSE contract reviews fare - if the contractor subsequently loses an IR35 case.Originally posted by Dylan View PostYep, next up one man ltd companies pretending to be in business, and the accountants that promote working like that
Comment
-
QC - so are you saying when you settle this is saying that it is 'defeated'? How does it work if only some settle and some don't???Comment
-
Or maybe you get hit by a bus and none of this would matter... risk is present in everything, but the level is very different.Originally posted by carling View PostOr maybe they will just retrospectively strengthen IR35 to stop avoidance in that area, "clarify" how it should have worked.Comment
-
I agree to an extent. However the risk of retro Ltd Co action surely goes up everytime HMRC get away with these "consultations".Originally posted by AtW View PostOr maybe you get hit by a bus and none of this would matter... risk is present in everything, but the level is very different.Comment
-
Those "consultations" are a sham - by the time they "consult" they'll have already made up their mind anyway - this is essentialy a forward warning on what will happen, so that those who have ears will hear it...Originally posted by carling View PostI agree to an extent. However the risk of retro Ltd Co action surely goes up everytime HMRC get away with these "consultations".Comment
-
If only.Originally posted by AtW View PostThose "consultations" are a sham - by the time they "consult" they'll have already made up their mind anyway - this is essentialy a forward warning on what will happen, so that those who have ears will hear it...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment