Thanks for the clarification. So what happens with an APN that is not taken through litigation? ie. the promoter etc. has done a runner or with this proposed legislation feels like its a waste of time and money. If the person has paid the APN amount but they don't want to settle does it just sit there?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Osborne Ultimatum
Collapse
X
-
-
First, the APN has absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH the settling of the enquiry or the determination of the final liability. It is just a mechanism to collect tax in advance of any such settlement or determination. It is not possible to take an APN through litigation in the way you mean here.Originally posted by difficulttimes View PostThanks for the clarification. So what happens with an APN that is not taken through litigation? ie. the promoter etc. has done a runner or with this proposed legislation feels like its a waste of time and money. If the person has paid the APN amount but they don't want to settle does it just sit there?
Second, the enquiry is into YOUR tax affairs. As such it does not matter if the promoter is no longer available or is with you every step of the way. Obviously easier if the promoter is around as they should (but sometimes don't) understad the scheme and the tax analysis. The enquiry can be settled by you agreeing with HMRC a figure, or by a Judge deciding what is or is not taxable. It is not possible for the tax to "sit there". Eventually the final amount of tax (interest and penalties) will be known and the APN will be a credit against that value.
If the APN is less than that value, you will pay some more. If the APN is excessive, you will get some back.
Whether you "want" to settle or not is irrelevant. Doing nothing will see a Judge settle a similar situation and you then get served with a Follower Notice which forces you to settle on the same or similar terms.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Yesterday 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Sep 2 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Sep 2 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08

Comment