• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Does the Google case set a precedent for negotiation regarding APN's?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Google may end up regretting not sticking to their guns that they'd already paid all the tax that was due under international tax law.

    In a perverse way, paying 3% tax is perceived as worse than paying no tax at all.

    HMRC will probably try and hide behind "taxpayer confidentiality" to avoid close scrutiny.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
      Google may end up regretting not sticking to their guns that they'd already paid all the tax that was due under international tax law.

      In a perverse way, paying 3% tax is perceived as worse than paying no tax at all.

      HMRC will probably try and hide behind "taxpayer confidentiality" to avoid close scrutiny.
      And how does this play out to many who want to negotiate a settlement on fairer terms?

      Dirty tax avoidance is how all are perceived who don't pay the equivalent of PAYE.

      Will HMRC be petrified of doing any sensible deals? Has Osborne the idiot played a PR blinder to scuttle any reasonable efforts of negotiating tax disputes?
      http://www.dotas-scandal.org LCAG Join Us

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by LandRover View Post
        And how does this play out to many who want to negotiate a settlement on fairer terms?

        Dirty tax avoidance is how all are perceived who don't pay the equivalent of PAYE.

        Will HMRC be petrified of doing any sensible deals? Has Osborne the idiot played a PR blinder to scuttle any reasonable efforts of negotiating tax disputes?
        That's what happened after the Hartnett deals with Goldman Sachs & Vodafone.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by meanttobeworking View Post
          ......David Cameron blames Labour for the bill, telling MPs at Prime Minister's Questions: We're talking about tax that should have been collected under a Labour government, raised by a Conservative government.".....

          And now they are back in government, they Royally ****** up the chance of making it right !!!!
          STRENGTH - "A river cuts through rock not because of its power, but its persistence"

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by LandRover View Post
            And how does this play out to many who want to negotiate a settlement on fairer terms?

            Dirty tax avoidance is how all are perceived who don't pay the equivalent of PAYE.

            Will HMRC be petrified of doing any sensible deals? Has Osborne the idiot played a PR blinder to scuttle any reasonable efforts of negotiating tax disputes?
            We have no choice but try and turn it on its head and use it as an attempt to strengthen our position, if at all possible !!
            STRENGTH - "A river cuts through rock not because of its power, but its persistence"

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by regron View Post
              We have no choice but try and turn it on its head and use it as an attempt to strengthen our position, if at all possible !!
              Utterly agree...if Google can get away with paying 3% then why can't the many contractors getting hammered with APNs that are retrospective plead, why are we being treated differently?

              Could be good PR if the media take it up.
              http://www.dotas-scandal.org LCAG Join Us

              Comment

              Working...
              X