• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Clegg to push for £12.5k income tax threshold at Budget

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
    You don't have to declare the father on a birth certificate. And then you run into the complexity of being a family unit but the current partner may not be the father of any / all of the children.
    Yes, so they still get the same tax allowance but they can't share it. Part of making the tax system family friendly is to create incentives for families to stay together.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by doodab View Post
      Yes, so they still get the same tax allowance but they can't share it. Part of making the tax system family friendly is to create incentives for families to stay together.
      No divorces until children grow up ...


      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by doodab View Post
        Yes, so they still get the same tax allowance but they can't share it. Part of making the tax system family friendly is to create incentives for families to stay together.
        But you'd bring it in for unmarried families who put the father on the birth certificate?
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
          IR35 reviews? Put the PCG in jail?

          Watching that "Scandamania" programme on telly last night he was saying how most Danes pay 50% in tax, but they're officially the happiest nation on earth (according to a UN survey). Which makes you wonder. Perhaps the issue is that we all think our public services are a waste of time and money, so resent paying for them, but perhaps if we had much better public services we wouldn't mind much higher taxes? Hmmm.
          A large part of the issue is the gap between the richest and poorest in a society. The more pronounced this is, the worse things tend to be in a particular country in terms of crime, health, mental health, educational outcomes etc. It would be no surprise if self reported happiness correlated with this as well.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
            But you'd bring it in for unmarried families who put the father on the birth certificate?
            Yes.
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by doodab View Post
              Yes.
              OK
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
                OK
                Well, that's me that is. I don't particularly want to get married and neither does ms doodab.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                  If a contract review includes advice to change a contract for no other reason than to avoid tax, how is that different? PCG provide contract templates and specific advice on how to avoid tax, so how is that not deliberate steps?
                  The personal allowance is a deliberate scheme to avoid tax, should we jail the government for allowing a tax avoidance scheme ?

                  Then there is Mapeley Steps, government sanctioned offshore tax avoidance....
                  Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

                  No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
                    The personal allowance is a deliberate scheme to avoid tax, should we jail the government for allowing a tax avoidance scheme ?

                    Then there is Mapeley Steps, government sanctioned offshore tax avoidance....
                    ISAs, pension contributions, fuel-efficient cars, giving up smoking...

                    Even being unemployed is tax avoidance of sorts.

                    Bang them all up.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
                      The personal allowance is a deliberate scheme to avoid tax, should we jail the government for allowing a tax avoidance scheme ?
                      It's not a tax avoidance scheme if it was clearly intended by Parliament.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X