Hmmmm, inneresting....
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Nick Griffin bankrupt
Collapse
X
-
-
If the country was in a position where a sizeable minority wanted to elect him to power, we'd have bigger problems than that. Ditto with banning him from standing from elections. That gives the impression he is a credible threat to the powers that be. He isn't.Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostGreat. Thank fu*k there is no chance of him ever coming to power.
Does the BNP even differ much from the three main parties on its policies barring its pepperings of racism?Last edited by Zero Liability; 3 January 2014, 22:20.Comment
-
The BNP just want Britain to retain it's culture and identity, nothing wrong with that - anyway one of their policies is to provide a nationalised 100mb broadband service across the country, fantastic.
It's the EDL you have to worry about.Comment
-
I beg to differ - mismanaging debts and going bankrupt are the kind of things Britain can do without...Originally posted by KackAttack View PostThe BNP just want Britain to retain it's culture and identity, nothing wrong with thatComment
-
Which is arguably less of an utter waste of money than HS2, but who's paying for it? That being said, Nick Griffin's personal money management skills are not that out of line with how the country has been governed the past few decades, I guess.Originally posted by KackAttack View PostThe BNP just want Britain to retain it's culture and identity, nothing wrong with that - anyway one of their policies is to provide a nationalised 100mb broadband service across the country, fantastic.Comment
-
So based upon this, you must think the EDL has more sound fiscal policy as their leader has not been made bankrupt?
Surely, most contractors must vote BNP for this one manifesto item alone: "The BNP will institute a policy of protectionism for the local IT industry and jobs."Comment
-
Yet another Russell incarnation?Originally posted by KackAttack View PostSo based upon this, you must think the EDL has more sound fiscal policy as their leader has not been made bankrupt?
Surely, most contractors must vote BNP for this one manifesto item alone: "The BNP will institute a policy of protectionism for the local IT industry and jobs."Comment
-
That was more of a jab than anything else. It is a rare politician who demonstrates much of a head for finances and economics, and isn't sold out to the point that they actually use it. Also, would one not expect an even stronger clamp down on contractors were the BNP to come to power? Labour is bad enough as it is, and the Conservatives are toothless (or very happy with the current situation, which is likelier.)
Also, regarding the stated objective of preserving Britain's identity and culture, that is all fine and good, but these are organic aspects of British society, and not something the government is really able of doing except in a very artificial sense. People have to like, want and live a particular culture for it to be preserved. Now, if you're referring to the policy of an open access welfare system with open borders not being very conducive to this, I can agree.
All political parties tout things that sound good in the abstract; it scarcely implies they possess or propose the means of actually achieving these.Last edited by Zero Liability; 3 January 2014, 23:15.Comment
-
Level playing field would probably be more feasible option.Originally posted by KackAttack View PostSurely, most contractors must vote BNP for this one manifesto item alone: "The BNP will institute a policy of protectionism for the local IT industry and jobs."Comment
-
How did NastyNick manage to go bust on an MEP's salary of about £75k a year plus £300pd unreceipted expenses ?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment