Is that would you would say to your dad (if your parents got divorced)?
-
The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.” -
Stick to you right hand Jabberwocky. Free love and all that.Comment
-
Living up to your class clown label I see.Originally posted by Jabberwocky
Marriage is a partnership freely entered into. Many of us have wives who not only run the household, but also support us so we are free to concentrate on running our businesses. Some wives give up careers or alternate lives to support us.
I doubt this chap would have been quite so succesful without the support of a good wife.
Her contribution is moot. Marriage is a partnership, assets should be split straight down the middle.
If you narried your blow up doll then she is entitled to half your assets.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
I don't see why she is liable for half - the article makes no mention of her making any contribution to the family earnings - other than to spend them I would think. As the mother of his children she is entitled to a reasonable settlement but I really don't see that she 'deserves' half his fortuneComment
-
Well, she got 37%. As a percentage this is actually quite low. I settled at 62% to my ex. As a principle, the % pissed me off, as it was a short marriage, albeit with 1 kid. But as a sum, it equated to 5 figures, which I have more than made up for in the 3 years' since, so I have relaxed a lot on the issue.Originally posted by John Galt
But it's the other way round for this milliionaire. I think the judge did him an absolute favour at 37%. It's just that the guy saw the issue in absolute terms - £48mn. If I was him I'd put up and shut up. I think he said that no reasonable person would get thru' £48mn in their lifetime. Well OK, but would he get thru' the other £82mn in his lifetime?"My God, it's huge!!"
Comment
-
He could have just spend a million getting her bumbed off and hired a nanny for the kids, what a clown!. Im sure a million would get you a top class hitman with no link back to you.Comment
-
Clown eh ? I think you can buy everything this gold digger provided - housekeeper, nanny, surrogate mother - it costs a lot less than 48m. Unless she came up with the big business ideas I think she should just get expected loss of earnings based on age and education.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanComment
-
Would certainly bring a new meaning to the terms 'third-party, fire and theft'.Originally posted by AtW
Comment
-
I agree with all that, and if he, or any other man just wanted those services then he should not get married should he.Originally posted by Jabberwocky
So why did he get married? Why does anybody get married?
You can not put a value on a marriage. It is entered into freely and is an equal partnership. If it hits the rocks then you split the assets or debts down the middle and walk away. Obviously children alter this equation.
It is not his money it is their money.
If he thinks the amount he is offering her is more than enough than anyone will need why does he need more?I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
You could get her wiped out for a couple of grand.Originally posted by Diestl
See you, you ****. I'll cut you first...
Comment
Comment