• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Bloody immigrants! I blame old IT contractors....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    I'm a non-EU furriner who travels a fair bit each year.

    It used to be that immigration had a separate queue for non-EU passports who are residents, but they've taken that away now, so I can queue for anywhere between 15 minutes to nearly 2 hours with all the other foreigners at T5. Once I get to the desk I take around 30 seconds to get through, normally.
    My residency stamp is in an old passport as they now charge some stupid amount to have it transferred to the new passport, when they used to just put a new stamp in the new passport when I first used it passing through immigration. The only questions I'm normally asked are "Why are you travelling to the UK" or "How long are you staying for", both of which are answered by "I live here", and "How did you get the right to reside here".

    They're changing my passport when I next get it renewed - up until now you could only get a 5 year passport, no RFID, cannot use photobooths. I missed signing up for IRIS by about 3 weeks, so now looking forward to getting a chip so that I can use the auto-gates. At least when I travel with my wife I can use the UK passport queue with her.

    Comment


      #22
      Its the remains of the Raytheon eBorders massive programme ongoing failure, layered alongside the 5 billion quid national ID programme that this government binned when they first got into office and replaced with a smaller version of itself.

      Still compared to the universal credit shambles of a programme, the NHS IT fiascos (and they have just thrown another billion quid at NHS IT nonsense today), and so on and so on

      To say nothing of the DCNS MOD programme currently in need of a submarine its so far underwater, the new aircraft carriers and the will they wont they hover planes

      The public sector sure knows how to waste

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
        IAt least when I travel with my wife I can use the UK passport queue with her.
        I'm UK and wife has ILR, we both go to the shortest queue together, always been let through but warned to use the other queue next time.

        Comment


          #24
          There's a short queue?
          Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
            At gatwick last week I waited 1 hour 43 minutes to get through passport control.

            Not funny with a baba and temperature like the tropics. I tried to tell others who were waiting, queuing is a British thing, it's what we do. Nothing beats a good queue. It did not appease.
            Go club and use fast track.
            What happens in General, stays in General.
            You know what they say about assumptions!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
              Go club and use fast track.

              It's a big price for a small privilege. Sometimes at Edinburgh I'll buy the fast track options on the airport's website, well worth the money.
              "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
                When my son & I returned from hols this year, I was surprised by the amount of time it took to get an Ok from passport control. She asked my son his name and he refused to answer. He was 4 yrs old, tired, and shy with strangers. She asked him where his mummy was and he continued to hide his face in my neck. She then asked a great deal of questions of me, focused mainly on why we were travelling alone [which we weren't]. It felt embarrassing, but I was quite chuffed to see how thorough she was.
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
                I was already carrying him [as well as two set of hand luggage ]. She was perfectly polite and I have to say, it didn't irk me. If she was suspicious, she needed to check.

                I'm just incredibly glad I decided to give my son my surname.
                Curious as to why a border official would grill a child like this - was your partner ethnic - i.e. white woman carring a non white child through passport control?
                How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Troll View Post
                  Curious as to why a border official would grill a child like this - was your partner ethnic - i.e. white woman carring a non white child through passport control?
                  Nope - all white, middle class, well spoken with the new biometric passports.

                  It's just another example of (a) Meeting quotas (b) Not being 'racist' by ethnic profiling.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Troll View Post
                    Curious as to why a border official would grill a child like this - was your partner ethnic - i.e. white woman carring a non white child through passport control?
                    No, we're both white, and we both have the same surnames on our passports.

                    No idea, I think she just didnt like the look of me.
                    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
                    +5 Xeno Cool Points

                    Comment


                      #30
                      If Britain joined Schengen most of you wouldn't have to bother with all this.

                      <lowers head and awaits flaming>
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X