• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

kids should stay at home with their mothers

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I'm not sure it is but take your point stability with whoever the 'parent' is is probably the key thing.
    No matter how equal we pretend to be, it's still the woman who gives birth and breastfeeds the baby, and therefore it's usually the mother who puts career on hold and ends up taking on most of the baby duties.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
      No matter how equal we pretend to be, it's still the woman who gives birth and breastfeeds the baby, and therefore it's usually the mother who puts career on hold and ends up taking on most of the baby duties.
      I'm with Mudskipper here. There's no bond I could create with my children, that their mother has. No chance. I am a studiously involved father, who loves spending all sorts of time with his kids. But, at the end of the day, they're locked into their mother, first for 9 months, then, in the main, another year or so with the bottle. There's nothing you can do to mimic childbirth.

      My wife has put her career on hold, and doesn't like to even have a night away from the kids. I have bought into it, as we will have more time together as they get older, and I can see they benefit from it.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
        No matter how equal we pretend to be, it's still the woman who gives birth and breastfeeds the baby, and therefore it's usually the mother who puts career on hold and ends up taking on most of the baby duties.
        MF breastfeeds babies. So there!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
          MF breastfeeds babies. So there!
          Well, he's got big enough tits, but the amount of tulip he spouts, I bet it isn't milk he's carrying around in those moobs

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
            MF breastfeeds babies. So there!
            I did have a rather inebriated discussion with an expectant father about whether it would be possible for a man to breastfeed. In theory it should - all the right bits are there, and men do sometimes produce a small amount of milk if their hormones are out of kilter. Breast milk, after the initial rush of hormones when you've given birth, is a supply and demand thing - stimulating the breasts causes milk to be produced. We devised a rigorous regime of daily nipple squeezing for him to follow, but I fear he failed to stick to the programme.

            He's a contractor - don't know if he reads these forums - if he does perhaps he'll give us a man milk update.

            Comment


              #16
              Kids need both parents. I think that for the first 12-18 months, dad is a bit of a spare wheel and mum clearly has the advantage as the primary care giver, but once they get a bit older it evens out and there are some things that only a dad can do.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #17
                My child is clearly doomed.
                My career, however, is not.

                *evil laugh*

                In other words - Bulltulip.

                The world, however, isn't set up for 'Equally Shared Parenting' (I recently found out there's a name for what we practice - hah!). We can do it because my contract as well as my other half's job is very, very flexible.
                Last edited by formant; 22 July 2013, 22:04.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by formant View Post
                  My child is clearly doomed.
                  My career, however, is not.

                  *evil laugh*

                  In other words - Bulltulip.

                  The world, however, isn't set up for 'Equally Shared Parenting' (I recently found out there's a name for what we practice - hah!). We can do it because my contract as well as my other half's job is very, very flexible.
                  Jesus, we could have done it, very easily. We chose not to, as we thought it would be better for the kids. We believe it was the right thing to do, and from how our kids are, think it's worked well.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Children need two carers, the second one steps in when the first starts strangling them. Grandparents help as well.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by BigRed View Post
                      Children need two carers, the second one steps in when the first starts strangling them. Grandparents help as well.
                      Yep - it's a tough job on your own.

                      Perhaps part of ante-natal classes should be an emphasis on giving your relationship priority - seems horrible when people with very young kids split up, they've hardly given it a chance.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X