• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Another wind farm...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by wurzel View Post
    That's what the guy from G2 argued at the council meeting. 25 years & it would be decommissioned.

    Though the council planning officer, who backed the proposal, had to admit that after 25 years the site would be classified as a brownfield site & it would never return to just being a field.
    Exactly. The reason being that they might remove the useless sticking out bit, but the thousands of tonnes of concrete will not be removed (as can be seen by a previous picture I posted).
    If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by hyperD View Post
      FTFY
      If they aren't economically viable (or ecologically) then fine. I don't know the details.
      Assuming that they were, though, I'd be amazed that so many people don't like them.

      Comment


        #33
        My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

        Comment


          #34
          What a bollocks eye-straining graph.

          I was kind of expecting Colonel Sanders to make the top of that list.
          If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

          Comment

          Working...
          X