Originally posted by Dominic Connor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Runaway Teacher Found Guilty
Collapse
X
-
I don't think counting pubes would work very well.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.' -
but there aren't that many 16 year old virgins around todayOriginally posted by Ketchup View PostI think the court will try and set a precedent. I completely agree, 15 is still a child, it is disgusting. I think 16 is too young for the age of consentHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
I think the law should be based on age difference. When i was 16 i had a girlfriend who was 15, under the law sleeping with her was illegal. In my eyes there is nothing wrong with that, but a 40 or 50 year old it is disgusting. If i were the law makers i would apply the 1/2 age plus 7 rule for relationships where the younger party is under 21.Originally posted by Troll View Postbut there aren't that many 16 year old virgins around todayComment
-
I think that is the problem, there are some very mature 15 years old, and very immature 16 year old's, one rule will never work for other situations so they have to air on the side of caution.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
So Bill Wyman should be locked up?Originally posted by Ketchup View PostI think the law should be based on age difference. When i was 16 i had a girlfriend who was 15, under the law sleeping with her was illegal. In my eyes there is nothing wrong with that, but a 40 or 50 year old it is disgusting. If i were the law makers i would apply the 1/2 age plus 7 rule for relationships where the younger party is under 21.How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
-
Which is why the law as it stands is not too bad, as it is generally applied with discretion.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI think that is the problem, there are some very mature 15 years old, and very immature 16 year old's, one rule will never work for other situations so they have to air on the side of caution.Comment
-
But a 50 year old can sleep with a very-very imature 16 year old and the law is powerless. But a 17 year old could sleep with a very mature 15 year old and go to prison.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostWhich is why the law as it stands is not too bad, as it is generally applied with discretion.Comment
-
Radio 4 news last night did mention that the girl was sat nearer his family than hers when the verdict was being read and that she was comforted by "an older woman" not her mother.Originally posted by suityou01 View PostHe said "I love you" as the jury returned. What's the story here? Does he love her? Is it reciprocated? Will we see them both on Jeremy Kyle when he gets out?
Sad tangled mess, but he did break the rules.
As you said, it's a sad tangled mess. The correct verdict was reached but it is hardly a moment for celebrationCoffee's for closersComment
-
I suspect that they will end up together. They went to france because the age of consent there is 15. They thought they would be safe, then realised the police were after him, concocted a story about how she was suicidal and agreed to come back together.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostRadio 4 news last night did mention that the girl was sat nearer his family than hers when the verdict was being read and that she was comforted by "an older woman" not her mother.
As you said, it's a sad tangled mess. The correct verdict was reached but it is hardly a moment for celebrationComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Today 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10

Comment