Originally posted by aussielong
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Permie morons
Collapse
X
-
Are the two mutually exclusive? Or are you just trying to get some random guy off the Internet to suck your cock? -
You worked out that stats puzzle yet?Originally posted by sasguru View PostA replacement for proggy. And so soon. That's CUk efficiency for you.
Comment
-
No. Why should I?Originally posted by aussielong View PostYou worked out that stats puzzle yet?
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Just to add my 2 pence worth
Had one of these the other day, user was saying last 6 months data is missing from system it went into the service team who could not fathom out why as when they looked at system all data was up to date.
Eventually they come to yours truly who quickly identifed the problem was that the user was logging into the training system (which is clearly labelled training at many points whilst you log on and during useage) and yes that data was approx 6 months old ( should have also been able to tell as all data had been desenstised so all customers were called John Smith)...
many of these
all round!
Comment
-
Had one dude on the Apps team yesterday who IM'ed me,
"Hi (insertmynamehere), I'm trying to create a connection but it's not working, I've been battling with this all morning!! Here's the code and error...."
"Servername..db.name.tblname"
"Error: The connection string will only accept a maximum of 3 qualified object names"
Me (after 3 seconds, quaking with unsuppressed laughter): You've got an excess dot between your server and DB name".
THEN proceeded to badger me to change some Insert code, I told him he needs to open a ticket, he gets a8sey and says, "It's just a small change", I reply, "It's just a small ticket! Open it now and I'll have the code sorted for you by lunchtime", he goes off in a huff and says he'll get a mate to change it.
BTW - any other DBA's here a bit nervous about Joe Schmoe users lurking on your DB's with SA rights????Comment
-
Do users change data directly in the DB? Do they make schema changes?Originally posted by Gym beast View PostBTW - any other DBA's here a bit nervous about Joe Schmoe users lurking on your DB's with SA rights????
If the answer is "No, they shouldn't", WTF are they SA users?Comment
-
Jesus, we've had users with SA rights turn off triggers as they couldn't get their data into the database, with predictable results.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostDo users change data directly in the DB? Do they make schema changes?
If the answer is "No, they shouldn't", WTF are they SA users?
The problem stems from the public sector managers having their person do work for them. So you have a DBA team, and Manager in Wilmslow has Fred, a chap who has been doing stuff for him for years, who he's secured admin rights to everything for. Not a DBA, but he was fairly competent with spreadsheets.
Seen it all through my contracting crew. We even had one chap change a data field name, as he didn't like it. These people are also, unfortunately, apparently unsackable...Comment
-
Though I'm projects/build normally, at a recent gig I helped out on BAU, got a ticket; Cannot receive xxxxx file from mainframe, this has not worked for 15 years....
Obviously critical then....Comment
-
(sighs)Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostDo users change data directly in the DB? Do they make schema changes?
If the answer is "No, they shouldn't", WTF are they SA users?
Because I may not demote them. Much as I'd like to.Comment
-
"Closed as stupid"Originally posted by stek View PostThough I'm projects/build normally, at a recent gig I helped out on BAU, got a ticket; Cannot receive xxxxx file from mainframe, this has not worked for 15 years....
Obviously critical then....Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Today 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Yesterday 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12

Comment