Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thatcher did not destroy Britains manufacturing
Collapse
X
-
-
Not you AtWOriginally posted by AtW View PostWhich one?
darmstadt
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
I didn't understand at the time why Thatcher wanted the price of gas "to be the same as electricity".Originally posted by zeitghostGas was much much cheaper.
Ever so much cheaper.
Until it's all gone, then it's ever so much more expensive.

I would have thought that she as a graduate chemist would have understood that a primary source of energy (gas) has to be cheaper than a secondary source (electrickery).
But no.
Of course at that time I hadn't seen the privatisation of gas coming.
Certainly not once the free market can slip an extra layer of middle men in.Originally posted by zeitghostCheaper electricity to heat our homes?

Yeah.
Right.
Eon eyes closure of gas-fired power plant - FT.com
The Economist reckoned that she paved the way for the disaster than was Enron.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Didn't Honda get somewhat upset about the way BL suddenly got rid of the agreement?Originally posted by Goatfell View PostBecause Renault, Peugeot, Citroen were never (quite) as shoddily designed and built as a lot of the BL stuff. As for Italian, have you tried to buy a Lancia here lately?
BL were hived off to Honda originally, that didn't last long.
The real laugh was when BMW sold Land Rover to Ford.Originally posted by Goatfell View PostIs it just co-incidental that BMW bought Land Rover, brought out the X5 (their first 4WD) then got shot of it?
They took the designs and intellectual property with them and Ford only found it had gone once they took over.
Oops.
And then BMW brought out the XS.
Don't forget, Ford needed a hand given their track record with the Granadas.Originally posted by Goatfell View PostFord bought Jaguar to widen their sales appeal to the luxury car buyer (think Lincoln or Lexus)
* they handed the large estate car market to Volvo by not providing an estate with the Granada Mk III
* the Scorpio thing that replaced the last Granadas looked plain ugly. From the rear it looked like it was going to burst into tears at any moment. Proof that standardising with Yank models was a dreadful idea, I never saw more than a handful on the roads, and I felt sorry for the owners of that handful.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostROVER SD1 2300 series
Gosh.
I can remember my neighbour pouring powersteering fluid into the reservoir & wondering where it was all going.
No sign of a leak, but start the engine & the reservoir emptied.
Quick squint under the bonnet revealed a rack gaiter that looked like a balloon.
He rented sommat else to go on holiday.
At the time, my mother had a Fiat 126, a tiny, cramped little thing that leaked in the rain and could hardly manage 60 mph. Imagine my consternation when we packed our bags into the Fiat to go to Italy on holiday and left the larger, more comfortable Rover behind at home. My father explained 'we can set off in style or we can get to Italy but we can't do both'.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I had a GTL or something. It was essentially the turbo with a larger engine but no turbo.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI had a Renault 5 Gordini I just loved it.
Great roadholding and it could surprise quite a few other drivers off the lights. It ran out of steam at higher speeds though.
The pain with it was when you zipped past a larger car that was faster, they'd take affront and want a race.
Which wasn't good when you had 200 miles to go and the other chap was just running his wife down the shops.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Mine did not have the turbo, but it had fantastic handling and performance. More of a poor man's Golf GTIOriginally posted by Sysman View PostI had a GTL or something. It was essentially the turbo with a larger engine but no turbo.
Great roadholding and it could surprise quite a few other drivers off the lights. It ran out of steam at higher speeds though.
The pain with it was when you zipped past a larger car that was faster, they'd take affront and want a race.
Which wasn't good when you had 200 miles to go and the other chap was just running his wife down the shops.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Didn't they also do a model with only something like 2000 cc? Perhaps not available to the public, this was a fleet lease job that a mate had.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMy father's SD1 was a 2300. Althought it's possible 200 had fallen off before it left the dealership. It was a company car; he had it for about 4 months of which most of the time was spent in the dealer's workshop, then his (American) boss demanded all the Rovers were taken back and refunded and he got a BMW instead, which was perhaps the most positive bit about having a company Rover; you knew it would be replaced by something better.
It was painfully underpowered.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
A bit like Mitch thenOriginally posted by Sysman View PostDidn't they also do a model with only something like 2000 cc? Perhaps not available to the public, this was a fleet lease job that a mate had.
It was painfully underpowered.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Noted problems with the 2600 the boss had were a starter motor failing to disengage thus burning itself out and an electric window which wouldn't wind up.Originally posted by zeitghostROVER SD1 2300 series
Gosh.
I can remember my neighbour pouring powersteering fluid into the reservoir & wondering where it was all going.
No sign of a leak, but start the engine & the reservoir emptied.
Quick squint under the bonnet revealed a rack gaiter that looked like a balloon.
He rented sommat else to go on holiday.
Both timed for maximum inconvenience on long trips of course.
The power steering took some getting used to as well. Get to 30 or 40 and it was way too light.
The Vanden Plas version he finally got was actually very nice to drive when it was working.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment