• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Is anybody else sick to death

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
    I presume your skin is white. You are therefore by definition, racist.
    I have a strong suspicion that you're sexist too (male) and probably homophobic (straight).
    Aren't you just ashamed of yourself?
    I am white, well tanned as I have just been to Egypt. I have a white a*se though and black balls (long story), but I don't regard myself as racist. I think I am probably sexist, but you can blame women for that, if they weren't so useless at stuff like work and driving and computer games then I might be a bit more tolerant. Homophobic? I saw Brokeback Mountain twice and thought of Heath Ledger once when I was in the shower at the gym so I think that clears me on that charge.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Bagpuss
      "That is the BBC's biasing playing with your mind."

      Hang on- the BBC is bias for not describing other types of racism as racism.
      But is also bias when it does.

      Where are you getting this propaganda from?
      No propoganda - self "derived" knowledge.

      That is the precise problem with racism - it's a self-referential accusation. Ultimately to acknowledge it's existence is to be a racist yourself.
      Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TheMonkey
        No propoganda - self "derived" knowledge.

        That is the precise problem with racism - it's a self-referential accusation. Ultimately to acknowledge it's existence is to be a racist yourself.
        Right, you can rise above the half baked rubbish served out by the "Disgusted of tumbridge wells" media despite most of this thread resembling exactly that.


        However, the rest of us mere morals are so easily swayed by the communist BBC?

        Are you trying to tell me now racism does not exist?
        You are joking, right?

        I guess Hitler wasn't a racist, yeah thinking about it, maybe I'm being self referential?
        The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

        But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

        Comment


          #14
          To themonkey

          Disagree on the concept of reverse racism.

          There are no quantitative conditions or connatations that define an action as racist.

          A racist action is an action motivated by the the race of the recipient or the association of a particular race to any object.

          If you want to split hairs a reverse racist action would be an action that is not motivated by race.

          Reverse racism is understood, in the modern context as asian/black on white violence, but IMHO it is essentially an incorrect definition.
          There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

          Comment


            #15
            Hitler

            Originally posted by Bagpuss
            Right, you can rise above the half baked rubbish served out by the "Disgusted of tumbridge wells" media despite most of this thread resembling exactly that.


            However, the rest of us mere morals are so easily swayed by the communist BBC?

            Are you trying to tell me now racism does not exist?
            You are joking, right?

            I guess Hitler wasn't a racist, yeah thinking about it, maybe I'm being self referential?
            No Hitler was a secular humanist.....
            There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

            Comment


              #16
              Secular humanist

              Fsck off, Hitler was a christian, he had god on his side, remember....
              Why not?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by sunnysan
                Disagree on the concept of reverse racism.

                There are no quantitative conditions or connatations that define an action as racist.

                A racist action is an action motivated by the the race of the recipient or the association of a particular race to any object.

                If you want to split hairs a reverse racist action would be an action that is not motivated by race.

                Reverse racism is understood, in the modern context as asian/black on white violence, but IMHO it is essentially an incorrect definition.
                I'm getting lost with all these fancy words, can't we talk about tits or rugby or something?

                Comment


                  #18
                  tits or rugby or something?

                  Err, surely twats and rugby?
                  Why not?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    will carling

                    Comment


                      #20
                      I rest my case

                      .........
                      Why not?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X