CompanyCheck's updated website doesn't work

[mudskipper]

Hehe - wonder how many of these are 'us'. Not Majestic obviously - that's a wine company.

RECENT SEARCHES
17:07:01 - Ace Scaffolding
17:07:00 - Majestic
17:06:59 - Simple Answers
17:06:57 - Simple Answers
17:06:57 - Raford Ltd
17:06:53 - Cardie Builders Merchants
17:06:52 - Michael J Billingham
17:06:51 - Cardi Builders Merchants
17:06:51 - Sa Energy
17:06:51 - Chudnovsky

[ctdctd]

Hehe - wonder how many of these are 'us'. Not Majestic obviously - that's a wine company.

RECENT SEARCHES

Well, I might recognise a couple

[Gentile]

Hehe - wonder how many of these are 'us'. Not Majestic obviously - that's a wine company.

RECENT SEARCHES
...

That, I'd say, is more concerning. Actually publishing what members of the public are searching for on their site could lead to problems with the ICO. Not because any of the entities being searched for have any right to privacy, but because of the information that it reveals about who has been searching for what.

[AtW]

That, I'd say, is more concerning. Actually publishing what members of the public are searching for on their site could lead to problems with the ICO. Not because of the entities being searched for have any right to privacy, but because of the information that it reveals about who has been searching for what.

I doubt it would breach Data Protection laws, but it's a stupid thing to do on public site - only puts people off from using it, maybe he will start charging for searches done without being put into the list

[AtW]

Even better business model - he could charge companies NOT be listed there!

[ctdctd]

It does tell me that myco's bank balance was zero last year - this is not true.
It was £8 - can I sue someone?

[Gentile]

Even better business model - he could charge companies NOT be listed there!

Wasn't there an American website that tried to do that recently, except with mugshots of people arrested for minor offences, then charging the subject $200 for removal? He soon discovered that there's a difference between re-broadcasting publicly-available information, and selectively publicising information for the express purpose of blackmailing the subject.

[AtW]

It does tell me that myco's bank balance was zero last year - this is not true.
It was £8 - can I sue someone?

It sounds like you've already been sued yourself...

...by life!

[ctdctd]

It sounds like you've already been sued yourself...

...by life!

Nah, I like myco's cash to be in mypocket

[Gentile]

It does tell me that myco's bank balance was zero last year - this is not true.
It was £8 - can I sue someone?

No, you'll just need to take that rider off your marketing material that says you made $492m more than Microsoft during Q2.