• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Market Rigging widespread in the City

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    I believe that's how they found out it was being fiddled?
    Why did not they not find that out next day rather than allowing this tulip go on for a few years?

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by centurian View Post
      It's the equivalent of the TUC being in charge of producing official statistics on workers productivity.
      Surely the same banks who are members of that "Union" were using published rates to decide their own policy? Nevermind lots of contracts around the world which used that benchmark rate.

      Comment


        #13
        I'm shocked, shocked to discover this.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          Surely the same banks who are members of that "Union" were using published rates to decide their own policy?
          Yes, but they knew that the published rates were a pile of tulip.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by centurian View Post
            Yes, but they knew that the published rates were a pile of tulip.
            Well, I sure hope somebody goes to jail for this what appears to me conspiracy to defraud - making rates they pay lower than they should so some suckers who believed them would get less money

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Well, I sure hope somebody goes to jail for this what appears to me conspiracy to defraud - making rates they pay lower than they should so some suckers who believed them would get less money
              The main difficulty is that the people submitting the false amounts did not personally gain from this (a bottle of Bollinger mainly), while the traders that did profit (increased bonuses etc.) did not submit false figures.

              However, I agree there must be some law they have broken - conspiracy to defraud, false accounting etc.

              Comment

              Working...
              X