Originally posted by Moscow Mule
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Market Rigging widespread in the City
Collapse
X
-
Why did not they not find that out next day rather than allowing this tulip go on for a few years? -
Surely the same banks who are members of that "Union" were using published rates to decide their own policy? Nevermind lots of contracts around the world which used that benchmark rate.Originally posted by centurian View PostIt's the equivalent of the TUC being in charge of producing official statistics on workers productivity.Comment
-
-
Yes, but they knew that the published rates were a pile of tulip.Originally posted by AtW View PostSurely the same banks who are members of that "Union" were using published rates to decide their own policy?Comment
-
Well, I sure hope somebody goes to jail for this what appears to me conspiracy to defraud - making rates they pay lower than they should so some suckers who believed them would get less moneyOriginally posted by centurian View PostYes, but they knew that the published rates were a pile of tulip.
Comment
-
The main difficulty is that the people submitting the false amounts did not personally gain from this (a bottle of Bollinger mainly), while the traders that did profit (increased bonuses etc.) did not submit false figures.Originally posted by AtW View PostWell, I sure hope somebody goes to jail for this what appears to me conspiracy to defraud - making rates they pay lower than they should so some suckers who believed them would get less money
However, I agree there must be some law they have broken - conspiracy to defraud, false accounting etc.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50


Comment