Originally posted by Moscow Mule
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Market Rigging widespread in the City
Collapse
X
-
Why did not they not find that out next day rather than allowing this tulip go on for a few years? -
Surely the same banks who are members of that "Union" were using published rates to decide their own policy? Nevermind lots of contracts around the world which used that benchmark rate.Originally posted by centurian View PostIt's the equivalent of the TUC being in charge of producing official statistics on workers productivity.Comment
-
-
Yes, but they knew that the published rates were a pile of tulip.Originally posted by AtW View PostSurely the same banks who are members of that "Union" were using published rates to decide their own policy?Comment
-
Well, I sure hope somebody goes to jail for this what appears to me conspiracy to defraud - making rates they pay lower than they should so some suckers who believed them would get less moneyOriginally posted by centurian View PostYes, but they knew that the published rates were a pile of tulip.
Comment
-
The main difficulty is that the people submitting the false amounts did not personally gain from this (a bottle of Bollinger mainly), while the traders that did profit (increased bonuses etc.) did not submit false figures.Originally posted by AtW View PostWell, I sure hope somebody goes to jail for this what appears to me conspiracy to defraud - making rates they pay lower than they should so some suckers who believed them would get less money
However, I agree there must be some law they have broken - conspiracy to defraud, false accounting etc.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08


Comment