• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Why europe is doomed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by bless 'em all View Post
    FTFY.

    Seriously though, can anyone imagine countries in Europe ceeding powers of tax/spending to the Germans in the long-term?

    It will have to happen. One thing is that most citizens of Euro countries are totally fed up with the ineptitude of their opwn politicians that I reckon they would gladly hand over financial control to the Germans. Given that the alternative is austerity whether it be staying in the Euro or coming out of it the voters will approve.
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #12
      Number of votes should be directly related to amount of tax paid ...

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Number of votes should be directly related to amount of tax paid ...
        You are becoming a bit of a self righteous and self important pri*k
        Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
          I reckon they would gladly hand over financial control to the Germans.
          Germans quite reasonably ask to spend only what people earn - want to spend more than earn more, that should be the only way. It's not German financial control - it's common sense that majority of Govts lost because it was much easier for them to borrow rather than have good policies that result in actual wealth increase.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
            You are becoming a bit of a self righteous and self important pri*k
            I take it you are not paying much tax eh?

            Perhaps votes should be split into annual tax bands:

            Fook all tax paid - 1 vote
            10k tax per year - 2 votes
            20-50k tax - 4 votes
            50-200k tax - 8 votes
            200-1 mln tax - 16 votes
            >1 mln - 32 votes.

            If the rich vote in laws that reduce tax they pay then they'll lose their votes and get fooked in next elections.
            Last edited by AtW; 13 June 2012, 12:02.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Germans quite reasonably ask to spend only what people earn - want to spend more than earn more, that should be the only way. It's not German financial control - it's common sense that majority of Govts lost because it was much easier for them to borrow rather than have good policies that result in actual wealth increase.
              So you have no borrowings then? personally or otherwise.
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                So you have no borrowings then? personally or otherwise.
                Zero.

                I think it's acceptable to take on mortgage as long as it is not overextending person (if it can be fairly easily repaid within 15-20 years).

                Some "bridge loans" also justifiable economically and loans to extend business operations assuming there is clear way to do so rather than speculative hope it would work.

                Other than that debt should be strongly discouraged - using tax system as well, right now when my company buy servers necessary for our operations we have to pay corp tax on them as if it's some kind of profit, but if we leased them that would be legit expense. It's bollocks system that encourages empty shell of companies that have no assets.

                I would have thought somebody like you who adores Thatcher would understand what ownership really means.
                Last edited by AtW; 13 June 2012, 12:06.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  I take it you are not paying much tax eh?
                  Not unless I have to
                  Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    Zero.

                    I think it's acceptable to take on mortgage as long as it is not overextending person (if it can be fairly easily repaid within 15-20 years).

                    Some "bridge loans" also justifiable economically and loans to extend business operations assuming there is clear way to do so rather than speculative hope it would work.

                    Other than that debt should be strongly discouraged - using tax system as well, right now when my company buy servers necessary for our operations we have to pay corp tax on them as if it's some kind of profit, but if we leased them that would be legit expense. It's bollocks system that encourages empty shell of companies that have no assets.

                    I would have thought somebody like you who adores Thatcher would understand what ownership really means.
                    What about 21 years? My mind doesnt work according to a set of binary rules like yours does.
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      I take it you are not paying much tax eh?

                      Perhaps votes should be split into annual tax bands:

                      Fook all tax paid - 1 vote
                      10k tax per year - 2 votes
                      20-50k tax - 4 votes
                      50-200k tax - 8 votes
                      200-1 mln tax - 16 votes
                      >1 mln - 32 votes.

                      If the rich vote in laws that reduce tax they pay then they'll lose their votes and get fooked in next elections.
                      Why should people who pay nothing get any say in how the money collected is used? Zero tax = zero votes in my book, id do the same with public sector workers too.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X