• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Somewhat of a record, even for "Horizon".

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    I was going to suggest that to make it more interesting they should have maybe gone with a female presenter

    But I think I know the answer....

    What's the name of that American presenter I've seen on a few Horizon type programs? She looks quite saucy.
    Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Troll View Post
      I was going to suggest that to make it more interesting they should have maybe gone with a female presenter

      But I think I know the answer....

      How about Liz Bonnin?

      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        How about Liz Bonnin?

        Hmmmm deffo
        How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

        Comment


          #14
          Kari Byron perhaps?

          (sorry it's a bit blurred, but I think her shape comes out well

          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Kari Byron perhaps?

            (sorry it's a bit blurred, but I think her shape comes out well

            That's not her but she'd do, or Liz.
            Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
              That's not her but she'd do, or Liz.
              +1
              How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                That's not her but she'd do, or Liz.
                That is Kari Byron (I think); look at those assets! And those thighs!

                Phwooar, I would!
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  That is Kari Byron (I think); look at those assets! And those thighs!

                  Phwooar, I would!
                  I'd even stoop to sloppy seconds me.
                  If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    She's a naturist too.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                      She's a naturist too.
                      Please provide the address of her favourite beach!
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X