Wonder if Rangers will have all the titles they won on the back of cheating on their taxes, revoked?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Rangers appointing an Administrator.
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
that's what I saidOriginally posted by geoff from contracta IOM View PostIts not so much assurances about the loans it's that the payments were contractural rather than discretionary thus negating the use of the trust.
Comment
-
As I said , nothing to do with assurances about not having to pay the loans back everything to do with the implied obligation of the trustees to advance the loans in the first place.Originally posted by jmo21 View PostThe story is that Rangers gave the players assurances in the form of a letter/contract they would not have to pay the EBT loans back, essentially rendering the EBT's incorrectly used, and effectively illegal.
They have charged Rangers with avoiding the tax/ni on what is then considered salary, eith fines etc on top.Comment
-
I suspect his point was more to do with HMRC not being a preferential creditor. I think this is specific to football clubs, where HMRC are treated the same as any other unsecured creditor (I may be wrong though.)Originally posted by russell View PostYeah, why would a businessman look out for his own interest, it's totally unheard of!!!
If at first you don't succeed... skydiving is not for you!Comment
-
I personally thought it was the case that HMRC won't become a creditor until the tribunal ruling thus giving the Mr Whyte the driving seat for a pre pack if he does it before the ruling ?Originally posted by TheBigD View PostI suspect his point was more to do with HMRC not being a preferential creditor. I think this is specific to football clubs, where HMRC are treated the same as any other unsecured creditor (I may be wrong though.)Comment
-
Originally posted by russell View Post"BREAKING NEWS: Glasgow Rangers given 3.30pm deadline to appoint an administrator. "
Comment
-
I was being facetious, the ACTUAL reason has NOT yet been published.Originally posted by geoff from contracta IOM View PostAs I said , nothing to do with assurances about not having to pay the loans back everything to do with the implied obligation of the trustees to advance the loans in the first place.
Either way, if true, Rangers made a cats tit of using EBT's.Comment
-
Sorry jmo and yes they obviously missed the induction classOriginally posted by jmo21 View PostI was being facetious, the ACTUAL reason has NOT yet been published.
Either way, if true, Rangers made a cats tit of using EBT's.
Comment
-
Officially in administration;
BBC News - Rangers Football Club enters administration
10 points deducted...
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment