• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Would you take a 50% pay cut?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    1) no

    2) in exchange for shares, maybe
    "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
      And Santa Claus should exist, but he doesn't. Nice logic.

      Scrapping NI would hurt Social Security, if it were use to pay for it, which it isn't.

      The reason you believe Santa is because you've never met him.
      The reason you've never met him is because you haven't been a good boy or girl.

      Where does that leave your so-called logic?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        Getting rid of NI contributions would just screw up the social security system.
        Keeping people employed means they don't claim unemployment benefits.

        Employer NI is total nonsense since by definition that employer is providing job in the first place, wtf is it paying insurance for?!?!

        There are so few manufacturing jobs left that removal of NIC on those is a no brainer - the trouble is dealing with those "creative" types who'd claim NI relief because they are somehow related to manufacturing.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
          1) no
          +1

          Would rather take 100%

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
            However if you had a skill in a dying industry and lived in the a**end of no where then taking a 50% cut with a hope that the business can turn round is preferable to claiming the dole.
            Not really. That's the time to get out, for that 50% pay cut will leave you stuck in a place that has no opportunities, and leave you without the brass to escape.
            Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

            Comment


              #26
              I was offered a 50% pay cut with the incentive of 200% pay back if the company was eventually bought out.

              I asked if I could do 50% of the hours instead -and work from home. Since they were near the end and needed me more than I needed them, they took my offer.

              So I got another job at the same time. Since I could work twice as efficiently at home with no interruptions, I ended up working 125% of a full time job and taking 150% pay.

              The company went under in the end.
              Last edited by aussielong; 7 December 2011, 04:39.

              Comment


                #27
                In response to the OP, it depends what the alternatives were.

                Bench? I'd take the 50% cut.
                Contracts available at decent rate? I'd move.
                Never has a man been heard to say on his death bed that he wishes he'd spent more time in the office.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Would never happen to us skilled professionals.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by russell View Post
                    Would never happen to us skilled professionals.
                    Is that because McDonalds has a good union?
                    Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
                    I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

                    I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
                      Is that because McDonalds has a good union?
                      No, they're in constant competition for the best fry rackers and burger flippers with Burger King. Only the best are good enough.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X