• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Bye Bye B-53

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    That was Castle Bravo, the first dry thermonuclear bomb.

    Ivy Mike was a "wet" proof of principle device, weighed 80 tons & was 25 feet high.
    I simply wanted to use the phrase "Give me the full physics package!" once, in a meaingful way, before I shuffle of this mortal coil.

    Now I've used it twice.

    Comment


      #12
      50 Mt is a big bang. I bet it made people jump when it went off.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
        50 Mt is a big bang. I bet it made people jump when it went off.
        Yup. Flash burns at 100 miles?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
          Yup. Flash burns at 100 miles?
          Wow. I bet it smarts closer in.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
            Wow. I bet it smarts closer in.
            "The Tsar Bomba's fireball <was>, about 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) in diameter"

            Might singe your hair a bit.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_bomba

            Ivy Mike - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
            Last edited by KentPhilip; 27 October 2011, 16:30.

            Comment


              #16
              windowpanes were partially broken to distances of 900 kilometres
              Ordinarily you'd think being 900 km away from an explosion would be a safe distance. Not if you are a windowpane.

              Comment


                #17
                The TNT equivalent of the 50 Mt test could be represented by a cube of TNT 312 metres on a side
                Which I estimated would be $2.5 trillion worth of TNT (at $50/kg for TNT). So in this case it looks as if nuclear works out cheaper.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                  Which I estimated would be $2.5 trillion worth of TNT (at $50/kg for TNT). So in this case it looks as if nuclear works out cheaper.
                  A better bang per buck.

                  As they say.

                  To say nothing of the delivery mechanism needed for the TNT.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X