Yes yes yes yes yes
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part two
Collapse
X
-
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool Points -
Erm, Yes. In fact, wouldn't stop until the neighbours complained about the smell
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
Thanks for your response Dave!Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostYes yes yes yes yesAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-

It'd be like a plasterers radioHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
-
Are lady posters excluded from these threads?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThanks for your response Dave!Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
Certainly not. Ladies joining in takes this to a whole new level.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostAre lady posters excluded from these threads?Just saying like.
where there's chaos, there's cash !
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!
Lowering the tone since 1963Comment
-
WHS^Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View PostCertainly not. Ladies joining in takes this to a whole new level.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
-
Not at all, I just remember being told (while discussing the urban dictionary with you on this site) that you're actually an 18 stone trucker called Dave. Maybe it was someone else.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostAre lady posters excluded from these threads?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Yesterday 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45

Comment