Yes yes yes yes yes
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part two
Collapse
X
-
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool Points -
Erm, Yes. In fact, wouldn't stop until the neighbours complained about the smell
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
Thanks for your response Dave!Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostYes yes yes yes yesAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-

It'd be like a plasterers radioHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
-
Are lady posters excluded from these threads?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThanks for your response Dave!Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
Certainly not. Ladies joining in takes this to a whole new level.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostAre lady posters excluded from these threads?Just saying like.
where there's chaos, there's cash !
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!
Lowering the tone since 1963Comment
-
WHS^Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View PostCertainly not. Ladies joining in takes this to a whole new level.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
-
Not at all, I just remember being told (while discussing the urban dictionary with you on this site) that you're actually an 18 stone trucker called Dave. Maybe it was someone else.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostAre lady posters excluded from these threads?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment