Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oil
Collapse
X
-
Banks. But they're not borrowing anything."A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s the s*** that happens while you’re waiting for moments that never come." -- Lester Freamon -
They must have bought the gilts and then sold them back to the BoE?Originally posted by Freamon View PostBanks. But they're not borrowing anything.
So it's a sneaky way of giving free money to banks?
Who then pay it out to bankers in salary and bonuses.
And that's supposed to help the 2.5 million people unemployed how exactly?Comment
-
banks keep it, to help their liquidityOriginally posted by DimPrawn View PostThey must have bought the gilts and then sold them back to the BoE?
So it's a sneaky way of giving free money to banks?
Who then pay it out to bankers in salary and bonuses.
And that's supposed to help the 2.5 million people unemployed how exactly?(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
US Oil
US oil and Brent crude both look like a down channel to me. You would have made money a lot less painfully on the sharp "elevator down" moves, than the slow "stair-steps" up.
US Oil:
Free image hosting for your screenshots + free screen capture tool'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
I can assure you there was no pain involved in buying at 99 and selling at 112 at £10 a pip.Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostUS oil and Brent crude both look like a down channel to me. You would have made money a lot less painfully on the sharp "elevator down" moves, than the slow "stair-steps" up.
US Oil:
Free image hosting for your screenshots + free screen capture tool

It's going to fall from here down to the mid 90's in about a months time.
As soon as it starts the turn I'll be shorting.

It's like shooting tax free fish in a barrel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freamon View PostBanks. But they're not borrowing anything.
No of course they are not borrowing anything - they are selling corporate "AAA" bonds to BoE at (probably) face value for real cash that they can use as leverage to loan up 10 times the money (probably from BoE as well) to put into highly leveraged commodities products designed to drive up price of basic goods into stratosphere - and nobody else gets hurt!!!
I mean FFS - if banks are doing it then there must be big ****ing profit involved in it, otherwise they would simply not do it.Comment
-
It pains me to say that I actually agree with Dim on the fall (Brent crude) back to 90 or even 82.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI can assure you there was no pain involved in buying at 99 and selling at 112 at £10 a pip.

It's going to fall from here down to the mid 90's in about a months time.
As soon as it starts the turn I'll be shorting.

It's like shooting tax free fish in a barrel.
'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
It's not free money, it's cash in return for gilts. Effectively the BoE is allowing the banks to swap their gilts for cash, permanently.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostThey must have bought the gilts and then sold them back to the BoE?
So it's a sneaky way of giving free money to banks?
Who then pay it out to bankers in salary and bonuses.
And that's supposed to help the 2.5 million people unemployed how exactly?
The idea is that instead of banks keeping gilts as part of their capital, they instead have cash which they can use to lend. Lending allows people to buy things they cant afford and therefore gives a temporary boost to the economy, bringing forward future growth at the expense of bigger personal/corporate debt and another bigger debt crisis further down the line.
The flaw is that banks are scared they have too little capital (nobody has defined how much is enough, and the penalty for guessing too low is nationalisation and the sacking of the board), so they're not lending any of the QE money, it's just sitting in their reserves, having no effect on the economy at all. Another reason is that virtually no solvent investable businesses are borrowing to expand, so there is nowhere for the banks to lend the money to."A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s the s*** that happens while you’re waiting for moments that never come." -- Lester FreamonComment
-
The BoE has not bought any corporate bonds since the very start of QE1, and even then they only bought a miniscule amount. All current QE will be banks selling gilts to the BoE.Originally posted by AtW View Post
No of course they are not borrowing anything - they are selling corporate "AAA" bonds to BoE at (probably) face value for real cash that they can use as leverage to loan up 10 times the money (probably from BoE as well) to put into highly leveraged commodities products designed to drive up price of basic goods into stratosphere - and nobody else gets hurt!!!
The money created under QE has largely sat in bank reserves. Exactly what "highly leveraged commodities products" do you think banks are piling into with QE money?
Banks obviously only ever do things that would make a profit, as banks never make losses.Originally posted by AtW View PostI mean FFS - if banks are doing it then there must be big ****ing profit involved in it, otherwise they would simply not do it.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s the s*** that happens while you’re waiting for moments that never come." -- Lester FreamonComment
-
Banks might lose money but they certainly won't be doing things that they won't think would make big $$$.Originally posted by Freamon View PostBanks obviously only ever do things that would make a profit, as banks never make losses.
When was the last time no serious bonuses were paid? Bank losses seem to have little to do with it - essentially banks seem to be run by their staff as they see fit, rather than actual owners (shareholders) of the bank making sure that there are no rewards for failure.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment