Maybe in future they'll consider a remotely activated self destruct option?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Don't go out on Friday
Collapse
X
-
-
If only they had missiles that could destroy it, or at least break it up in the upper atmosphere, ensuring total burn up before it hits the ground.
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
It's much cheaper to settle insurance claim.Originally posted by PAH View PostIf only they had missiles that could destroy it, or at least break it up in the upper atmosphere, ensuring total burn up before it hits the ground.
HTHComment
-
Couldn't they borrow AtW's 40 watt plasma gun and zap it?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I can't get two references to get oneOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostCouldn't they borrow AtW's 40 watt plasma gun and zap it?
Comment
-
Blowing stuff up may not be a great option as that could create a lot of space debris, which is bad. But I wonder whether a simple change of the dimensions of objects would do it, where this is possible, e.g. the batteries. More surface area/volume or better aerodynamics (less brick-like) the more chance it has of burning up, I imagine.Comment
-
Why didn't they get the space shuttle to bring it home on it's last trip? Too big for the cargo bay?
Maybe it's one of those distraction events orchestrated to pull the rug from under your feet while you're busy looking up at the sky. Let's see what bad news gets buried in the next 24 hours....Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Satellites are regularly falling to earth but because of their size only a few pieces make it through re-entry. If this bus-size one was broken into smaller bits before re-entry there would be lass chance of sizable pieces making it through, shirley? Additional charges should be deployed on the bigger structures to ensure they were reduced to a 'burnable' size.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostBlowing stuff up may not be a great option as that could create a lot of space debris, which is bad. But I wonder whether a simple change of the dimensions of objects would do it, where this is possible, e.g. the batteries. More surface area/volume or better aerodynamics (less brick-like) the more chance it has of burning up, I imagine.Comment
-
They should have coated it in something highly flammable to encourage burn up, like a giant fat ball.
Alternatively they could have put a big electromagnet in it, and turned it on to collect some space debris on the way down.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Yes, but explosives have exhaust speeds in excess of 1000 m/s (TNT = 7 km/s), which could put junk into stable orbit, and it doesn't have to be large junk to be a problem.Originally posted by wobbegong View PostSatellites are regularly falling to earth but because of their size only a few pieces make it through re-entry. If this bus-size one was broken into smaller bits before re-entry there would be lass chance of sizable pieces making it through, shirley? Additional charges should be deployed on the bigger structures to ensure they were reduced to a 'burnable' size.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09

Comment