Maybe in future they'll consider a remotely activated self destruct option?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Don't go out on Friday
Collapse
X
-
-
If only they had missiles that could destroy it, or at least break it up in the upper atmosphere, ensuring total burn up before it hits the ground.
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
It's much cheaper to settle insurance claim.Originally posted by PAH View PostIf only they had missiles that could destroy it, or at least break it up in the upper atmosphere, ensuring total burn up before it hits the ground.
HTHComment
-
Couldn't they borrow AtW's 40 watt plasma gun and zap it?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I can't get two references to get oneOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostCouldn't they borrow AtW's 40 watt plasma gun and zap it?
Comment
-
Blowing stuff up may not be a great option as that could create a lot of space debris, which is bad. But I wonder whether a simple change of the dimensions of objects would do it, where this is possible, e.g. the batteries. More surface area/volume or better aerodynamics (less brick-like) the more chance it has of burning up, I imagine.Comment
-
Why didn't they get the space shuttle to bring it home on it's last trip? Too big for the cargo bay?
Maybe it's one of those distraction events orchestrated to pull the rug from under your feet while you're busy looking up at the sky. Let's see what bad news gets buried in the next 24 hours....Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Satellites are regularly falling to earth but because of their size only a few pieces make it through re-entry. If this bus-size one was broken into smaller bits before re-entry there would be lass chance of sizable pieces making it through, shirley? Additional charges should be deployed on the bigger structures to ensure they were reduced to a 'burnable' size.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostBlowing stuff up may not be a great option as that could create a lot of space debris, which is bad. But I wonder whether a simple change of the dimensions of objects would do it, where this is possible, e.g. the batteries. More surface area/volume or better aerodynamics (less brick-like) the more chance it has of burning up, I imagine.Comment
-
They should have coated it in something highly flammable to encourage burn up, like a giant fat ball.
Alternatively they could have put a big electromagnet in it, and turned it on to collect some space debris on the way down.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Yes, but explosives have exhaust speeds in excess of 1000 m/s (TNT = 7 km/s), which could put junk into stable orbit, and it doesn't have to be large junk to be a problem.Originally posted by wobbegong View PostSatellites are regularly falling to earth but because of their size only a few pieces make it through re-entry. If this bus-size one was broken into smaller bits before re-entry there would be lass chance of sizable pieces making it through, shirley? Additional charges should be deployed on the bigger structures to ensure they were reduced to a 'burnable' size.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08

Comment