Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Yes, I did. It’s interesting that the report focused entirely on the dog rather than the incident with the two girls. Obviously what happened to the dog is twisted but attacking children is an entirely different matter.
Serious question; the guy was obviously a social inadequate who committed these crimes because it was the only way to realise his desires. Would some form of prostitution on the NHS help to prevent such incidents, by giving weirdoes who lack the means to form normal relationships an opportunity to release their sexual tensions within a controlled environment?
It should be part of a committed loving relationship. Trouble is with that, if you split up you may find your hamster has a right to half your earnings. Or for those of us with wider tastes, two thousand woodlice get 50p each.
PS I would like to point out that this thread is about .net.
PPS And it wasn't me who sidetracked it in this unfortunate way, it was WageSlave (again) only I always get blamed for these things.
a bytecode interpreter is faster than native code...
a bytecode interpreter is faster than native code...
Yes, it often can be.
The reasons are fairly simple. A bytecode interpreter is generally written for speed whereas a compiler for native code has to handle all the wierdness of the HLL Also bytecode for a large selection of functions is smaller than the equivalent in native code, use of Threadeds Superlinear Speedup method will make it obvious why this is a way to increase speed.
Not many people can write good fast machine code, and very few companies are willing to shell out for them to do it.
Talking heads nowadays say the compiler is cleverer than people, yet saying the compiler is good to re-order the execution etc. is a bit of a myth. I've found most compilers produce better code for processor X when told to make code for processor Y for any individual function.
Comment