Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The market works in such a way that businesses like yours do not need to spend any money on sales and marketing -what other industry enjoys such a privilige.
Rubbish. I'm marketing myself on linkedin. Knowledge of this contract would have come my way possibly a week or two after the agent got hold of it - when I socialised with my friend who is on the project.
The quid pro quo is that agents when they do place contractors are rewarded to compensate for all the work they do that yields nothing.
Riiiiggggghhhht. That's creative accounting. So I am currently being paid a decent rate and that rewards me for unpaid time on the bench spent skilling up. Therefore my average rate is quite low and your percentage should be based on that average rate rather than the real rate?
Clearly this agent has added value because he has alerted you to an opportunity that by your own admission you did not know about. You seek to justify using the information he has trusted you with to opportunistically feather your own nest.
I agree the agent should be compensated for his actions. 20% is too greedy and encourages me to do this kind of thing.
Rubbish. I'm marketing myself on linkedin. Knowledge of this contract would have come my way possibly a week or two after the agent got hold of it - when I socialised with my friend who is on the project.
Riiiiggggghhhht. That's creative accounting. So I am currently being paid a decent rate and that rewards me for unpaid time on the bench spent skilling up. Therefore my average rate is quite low and your percentage should be based on that average rate rather than the real rate?
I agree the agent should be compensated for his actions. 20% is too greedy and encourages me to do this kind of thing.
Some of them new to the game are clueless with regard to margins and agency tactics. You parasites feed off those.
And who exactly are you to decide that 20% is too greedy? What are you basing this judgement on? Who exactly are you to accuse another business person of being greedy? as you are the proclaimed righteous individual who seems to be so divinely charged with making judgements about others "greed are for example Tesco more or less greedy because they make a 4000% mark up on cabbages?
as far as parasites are concerned what percentage of contractors are naive and new to the market? and how many agencies feed off this group of people?
What you do is entirely your own business, and I will even add that it is naive of the agent to approach you and hand over such information in what is clearly such a closed market. My point however still stands which is that you are an opportunist which makes you no better than the agents you criticise. The fact that you try to justify your own greed by judging agents as unworthy makes you look an even bigger hypocrite.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone
And who exactly are you to decide that 20% is too greedy? What are you basing this judgement on? Who exactly are you to accuse another business person of being greedy? as you are the proclaimed righteous individual who seems to be so divinely charged with making judgements about others "greed are for example Tesco more or less greedy because they make a 4000% mark up on cabbages?
I am able to say 20% is too greedy because its my 20% that i've earned. I can't say Tesco's are too greedy for their markup because they are not directly impacting my income - I have a choice to not buy cabbages.
What you do is entirely your own business, and I will even add that it is naive of the agent to approach you and hand over such information in what is clearly such a closed market.
My point however still stands which is that you are an opportunist which makes you no better than the agents you criticise.
Agent is taking a lot of money from me for doing hardly any work. I am taking my own money back from him. How is that equal? And how can you generalise from that to opportunism.
Comment