• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Swiss party demands Powerpoint's death

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Me! Me! ME look at ME!!!!! I hate powerpoint waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

    Its the suityou01 of political parties


    Powerpoint is blameless in all of this, the real fault lies with the dullards who create a presentation for the purpose of reading it out loud to the audience.
    Coffee's for closers

    Comment


      #12
      Of course there are exceptions – speakers who can give a good presentation despite PowerPoint*. But this is the same as fastening your seatbelt in a car. Just because it happened 5 out of 1000 times that the non-fastening of the seatbelt saved a life during an accident, one cannot justify that the non-fastening is the principle to stick to. Just because it happened that someone gave a good speech with PowerPoint* one can’t justify that using PowerPoint* is the principle to stick to.

      As long as one has not yet become acquainted with the alternative method that I suggest on this website, one will be tempted to believe that PowerPoint* is the nonplus ultra if only one uses it correctly. But we can prove No!

      When you use PowerPoint* the audience’s eyes are directed rigidly at the screen. The human being is subject to a reading compulsion. You can omit the speaker altogether. This is assisted reading!

      When you observe carefully you will recognize that the energy of the audience is decreasing as soon as a projector projects something onto the wall. You can actually feel that. What is even more dramatic: The exchange of energy between the speaker and the audience is blocked by PowerPoint*. You divide the attention instead of focusing it. Convincing is being impeded.

      The serious problem with PowerPoint* is that speech is forced into a structure, which works against the natural flow of speech. Speech is cut up into small bites.

      PowerPoint* leads to substantiation and the formulation of word-monstrosities, which can only be processed by the mind, where your emotions are not triggered. That, which is normally expressed with a verb, becomes a noun in a PowerPoint*. An example: The two freely spoken sentences: “The rain sensor recognizes if it’s raining and turns on the windscreen wipers. The rain sensor senses, how hard it is raining and switches the wipers to faster”, get hacked into noun-slogan sentences with PowerPoint*.

      Unfortunately the following then happens during the presentation. The speaker, who is using the charts as cue-card notes reads the sentence with a glance before he starts to speak. The expression on the slide enters his short-term memory, so that it becomes almost impossible for him to express it in vivid every-day language. So he more or less reads this disastrous sentence verbatim. After about five or six slides at the latest, no one in the room is listening.
      I think they make a very persuasive argument. Powerpoint blows goats.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        #13
        PowerPoint* leads to substantiation and the formulation of word-monstrosities,
        I've used powerpoint a few times, it's never written anything on the slides for me or is this a new 2010 feature I've not seen yet?
        Coffee's for closers

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
          I've used powerpoint a few times, it's never written anything on the slides for me or is this a new 2010 feature I've not seen yet?
          I bet you wrote a load of bollocks on them though
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by doodab View Post
            I bet you wrote a load of bollocks on them though
            I write feck all

            All they need is a couple of titles and some conceptual diagrams

            EDIT: That is when I do bother using Powerpoint, for 1 or 2 diagrams its simpler just to open visio
            Last edited by Spacecadet; 7 July 2011, 14:13.
            Coffee's for closers

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by doodab View Post
              I think they make a very persuasive argument. Powerpoint blows goats.
              The best 2 I've seen this year had hardly any words on them at all. One was done by an architect, the other by a guy who used to work in the fashion industry.
              Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

              Comment


                #17
                Gets my vote.

                Keynote is much better, because steve says so.
                "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                Comment


                  #18
                  I've seen some good Powerpoint presentations and some tulip ones. I bet if the same people used a flip-chart then the good presentations would still be good and the tulip ones still tulip.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                    Powerpoint is blameless in all of this, the real fault lies with the dullards who create a presentation for the purpose of reading it out loud to the audience.
                    Absolutely spot on!

                    In addition, middle managers need to grow a pair and learn to (in Dilbert's words) postpone meetings with timewasting morons.

                    One of the big US corporates apparently had (has?) a digital readout in their meeting rooms that showed the cost to the company minute by minute based on the attendees hourly rate.
                    The vegetarian option.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
                      One of the big US corporates apparently had (has?) a digital readout in their meeting rooms that showed the cost to the company minute by minute based on the attendees hourly rate.


                      I have an app on my phone that does that. It cheers me up no end in dull meetings.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X