• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

For Madmen Only

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    +++

    Philippe Soupalt tries to free himself from the three
    unities of number, space and time, but feels himself a
    prisoner within the four cardinal points.

    He calls his book "Rose des Vents" (Compass Card). He is
    aiming at the lyrical ubiquity towards which Apollinaire's
    orphism was tending.

    Philippe Souplalt turns the compass dial on its axis. He
    scorns the conception of the universe inflicted on him by
    the grey matter of his brain. To resolve all opposition he
    turns to Dada.

    My ideas like germs
    dance along my meninges
    to the rythm of the exasperating pendulum
    a revolver shot would be a sweet melody.


    He wants to go outside himself. Free himself from
    determinism. He scales horizons. "I have broken my static
    ideas," he says. Modern discoveries show him glimpses of
    metaphysical probabilities. The Eiffel Tower shoots its
    beams to the four corners of the world. The idea of space is
    an illusion imposed on our senses by matter. Everything
    moves on the same level. He persuades himself that the
    Gaurisanker is next door to Notre Dame. He is simultaneously
    open to all sensations.

    The thousand interpretation that words admit of meet in his
    mind when he sees a common notice:

    REMOVALS TO ALL COUNTRIES

    This, I think, is how the Dada joke must be understood.
    Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

    Comment


      #22
      +++

      Louis Aragon has not foresworn every scruple of art.
      Sometimes he even seems to remain attached to the old
      prosodic forms. Yet Loius Aragon has found his salvation in
      Dada. He calls his book "Bonfire". It is a bonfire on which
      he sacrifices all the vain acquisitions of his mind for a
      new order of things that will arise from the absurd
      suggestions of consciousness. A neutral colour - bitumen or
      reseda - is not Aragon's favourite. We even find bright
      colours the Dadas were generally not fond of.

      In a piece called "Jolt", Aragon shows us how a sudden
      change comes about in the orientation of his thought:

      BROUF
      Flight for ever from the bitterness
      The wonderful flying meadows newly-painted turn
      Stumbling fields
      Standstill
      My head rings and so many rattles
      My heart is in pieces the scenery shattered

      The poet remembers his adolescence, the years vexed with
      latin and algebra and he sums up his youth in a poem, "life
      of Jean Baptiste A."

      Rosa the rose and that drop of ink oh my youth
      Calculate Cos. &
      in function of
      tg. a/2
      My Apero childhood hardly glimpsed
      By the fly-blown windows fo a cafe
      Youth and I didn't kiss every mouth
      The first one to get to the end of the corridor
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DEAD
      A shade sleeps in the middle of the sun, it's your eye


      But now that the poet has rid himself of the narrow human
      conventions, a hope is aflame in his breast. By the light of
      this bonfire he glimpses new constructions, salutary
      transformations.

      Then will rise the ponies
      Youths
      In bands by the hand by the town


      Louis Aragon is the only Dada who seems to be preparing a
      territory of conciliation between the suggestions of
      consciousness and the demands of reason.
      Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

      Comment


        #23
        +++

        Paul Eluard is aiming at a complete transformation of
        language. "Let's try," he says, "it is difficult to remain
        absolutely pure." Language as it reaches us by way of usage
        no longer has any meaning. It is chatter which, according to
        Paul Eluard, no longer has any raison d'etre, and he wants
        to institute, in poetry, the most elementary simplicity.

        In "Animals and their Men" he endeavours to refresh his
        vision of the world by simplified images and initial
        analogies: The fish in the air and the man in the water. The
        grass in front of the cow, the child in front of the milk.

        Paul Eluard wants to retain nothing of things but the
        essential relation-ships in order to obtain a complete
        purity of feeling. Here is an example of this elementary
        poetry:

        WET
        The stone skims over the water
        The smoke does not enter.
        The water like a skin
        That cannot be wounded
        Is caressed
        By man and by the fish
        Snapping like a bow-string,
        The fish, when the man catches it,
        Dies, as it cannot swallow
        This planet of air and light
        And the man sinks to the bottom of the water
        For the fish
        Or for the bitter solitude
        Of the supple ever-closed water.

        What extremely shocks Paul Eluard's set purpose of
        simplicity is the "distinguished allure". According to him,
        poetry must be something "naive like a mirror". He conceives
        of a poetry where "time does not pass". It is difficult, as
        man moves in a thick atmosphere. In his Examples, he says:
        "man, the air-diver". Yet he has a confused glimpse of a
        universal unity that makes him say: "I have crossed through
        life in one go".

        +++

        Francis Picabia is not concerned with practical
        applications. He uses a systematic curtness to destroy
        everything. It would be difficult to find a more complete
        absence of morality elsewhere.

        It is in the agitated state that follows on love that
        Francis Picabia tries to formulate for himself a conception
        of man stripped of all illusion.

        Read my little book
        after making love
        in front of the rubber fireplace

        He calls this little book "Thoughts without language". As he
        does not want to be taken in by words.

        He no longer distinguishes values. Love, art, religion:
        chemical reactions. It is a quasi-psychological Dada. The
        heart is like the prostate gland, the belly like the brain.
        And Francis Picabia says:

        The events of my life
        Take place in the sauce
        Of my heartbeats.


        In "The Girl born without a Mother", poems accompanied by
        drawings, he applies himself to seeing the erotic mechanism
        work. He takes desire for the only reality, and there is
        hardly anything he believes in other than seminal fluid.

        Life, according to Picabia, is not a "cream cake"; it is an
        "old music-box" that churns out the same tune over and over.
        As for the price he puts on human knowledge? "Men thinh", he
        says, "Like a free Chinaman."

        Francis Picabia experiences an innocent pleasure in throwing
        stink bombs in schools and academies. The smell of sodium
        cacodylate does not put him off.

        In "Jesus Christ Rastaquouere" Picabia's disillusioned
        philosophy seems for an instant as if it is trying to escape
        from its incoherence. But if Picabia expresses himself a
        little more clearly than usual, it is to turn common sense
        inside out like a glove. His deliberately disorientated mind
        enjoys standing the scale of values upside down. "it's words
        that don't exist", he says. "What doesn't have a name
        doesn't exist." And by some kind of metaphysical spite he
        uses a conjuror's skill to juggle with traditional
        locutions.

        I can only give my word of honour if I am lying. Cheat, but
        don't hide
        it. Cheat in order to lose, never to win, for a winner loses
        himself,
        etc.

        And he sums up his opinion of life in a short story: The
        story of a man who chewed a revolver!

        "This man was already old, and all his life he had indulged
        in this strange chewing; in fact his extraordinary weapon
        would kill him if he stopped an instant; yet he had been
        warned that, in any case, one day inevitably the revolver
        would go off and kill him; however, with no sign of
        wearying, he went on chewing..."


        Francis Picabia, strange he may seem, is a tragic poet.
        Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

        Comment


          #24
          +++

          Clement Pansears is the only representative of Dada in
          Belguim and it is extremely unlikely that anyone here will
          thank him for it. Yet nobody can let his mind roam on the
          periphery of the world of reason, in the barely accessible
          regions of the absurd, as easily as Pansears.

          The "Pan-pan au cul du nu negre" is Clement Pansears' first
          attempt. This title may mean the "nu negre" followed by the
          "pan-pan", but I think that by pan-pan Clement Pansears
          means a revolver. So it would be different then. Clement
          Pansears listens to all the discordant noises that surround
          us today. He seems to have surveyed all the ideas, as we can
          see from certain things he says ("Une museliere au rheteur
          de la surbrute", etc.) and in the end he gives the
          impression of a disorganised gramophone that begins to sound
          the all-clear when it comes to the end of the record.
          Clement Pansears misuses scientific terminology. Now and
          again, one thinks of Rabelais' Limousin scholar, but he
          justifies himself by saying, "A useless chemist is as good
          as a philosopher - who discovers principles by evaporating
          vocables."

          In "Bar Nicanor" Clement Pansears follows the same tendency,
          but to a much greater degree. Clement Pansears launches into
          heady delights. In the piece called "Aero" he upsets the
          cardinal points. He drives in the void, executes "trapeze
          turns". His ears tingle by dint of "browsing raw noises in
          interplanetary scales". He exhausts his engine to get as
          much as possible out of it.

          Getting drunk procures the same incongruous feelings for
          him. He puts his lips to every electuary and examines his
          half-drunkenness to unveil the speck of immateriality that
          throbs inside him. He praises the eminently cosmopolitan
          nature of drunken orgies. Solving existence, according to
          him, is to take a good one over the eight until the walls
          knock into each other, while the principle of being pursues
          the "motley race towards pure quality the infinite
          denominator leading to zero pan-O."

          Perverted feelings run through the erogeneous zones. He
          destroys woman as a child would a toy, annoyed at not
          getting something more wonderful. Clement Pansears makes one
          think of a Des Esseintes corresponding to the wildest
          audacity of the new man. In "The defence of laziness" a
          morbid perturbation seems to result from the constant effort
          of mental inversion. Sudden shocks like electric bells
          crackle in his head. Clement Pansears has been, one after
          the other, "a tamer of tribades", "a paria esdemolitions",
          "a violator of human identity".

          Men seem sexless to him. With an Erasmic indifference he
          creates a defence of laziness. What is cynicism, if it is
          not laziness? Laziness in the sovereign condition of human
          reason.

          It's annoying
          My encephalus is out of tune.
          Impossible to re-tune my understanding
          to the tuning fork of the fashionable cosmic variations.


          He resigns himself to sacrificing to laziness:

          Do I revolt you?
          All revolt aborts.


          What is the point of rebelling? Let us do like the others
          do. Instead of creating the revolutions, let us go on
          general strike. Everything is there. In any case laziness
          extends to the first terrestrial elements.

          Spasmodic morbidness
          Sea and land
          Penetrate each other
          and the commotion is comatose.


          "Be lazy," Clement Pansears says to himself, possessed with
          an orgiastic weariness. Clement Pansears is a modern man in
          the most excessive meaning of this expression.

          +++

          These are the people who form the Dada Pleiad. But it is
          difficult to be conclusive as regards Dada, as Dada is a
          return to unorganised life, by a means of expression
          stripped of any verbal habits. Dada makes fun of
          onomatopoeia.

          In ancient times they used to say that those who had lifted
          the veil of physical phenomena had seen the great god Pan.
          The upheavals of our time that have revealed a solution of
          continuity in the evolution of mankind have given rise to a
          panic literature. Dada is without doubt a pessimistic
          movement. But its pessimism is based on the danger of human
          ambitions. It is in de la Rochefoucald and Schopenhauer that
          we must search for the preliminaries to an international
          agreement. Dada is the only possible link between men since
          its fundamental principle consists in being right about
          nothing. Not to know Dada is not to know our time. In a
          century when Lenin falls after Wilson, Dada has nothing that
          can surprise us. Dadas are deliberately out of their depth.
          But if they are fools they are not stupid. They say nothing
          for a laugh and take nothing seriously.

          Dada is a philosophy. Dada is a moral. Dada is an art, the
          art of being likeable in a time when all superiority has
          become unbearable and when all human grandeur seems a joke.
          Dada is the flower of ruins, not the little blue flower of
          optimism that poets want to pick amid the debris of a
          civilisation, but an azalea, an arid azalea, which is not
          begging for a downpour of blood, but is rather seeking to
          slake its thirst in drought.
          Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

          Comment


            #25
            The study of luminous radiations suggested to him unhoped
            for results. The idea of infinity, which has tormented
            human reason throughout all eternity, for the first time
            perhaps seems to subside in the Einsteinian axiom: "Nothing
            is faster than light". The existence of an absolute speed is
            not beyond our understanding.


            Ah not so fast , what if the Universe aint quite what Albert imagined it to be, ie that its is holographic in its nature, perhaps the Hindus were closest to describing the Universe as illusory, now you see it ... now you dont !

            From the Orignal Post

            Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn't matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart.

            Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein's long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light.

            Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to explain away Aspect's findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more radical explanations
            Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 13 March 2006, 17:59.

            Comment


              #26
              Dada Dum, da dum da dum. Dum de do dum. Da da dum, dada ....
              Hard Brexit now!
              #prayfornodeal

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by sasguru
                Dada Dum, da dum da dum. Dum de do dum. Da da dum, dada ....
                Exactly SG.

                Im terribly sorry to have taken your time but the thought just occured ...


                Hare Hare... London Bus
                Hare Hare ... Ladies Lavatory
                Hare Hare ... Computer Contractor


                Nothing remains to be said.


                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
                  Exactly SG.

                  Im terribly sorry to have taken your time but the thought just occured ...


                  Hare Hare... London Bus
                  Hare Hare ... Ladies Lavatory
                  Hare Hare ... Computer Contractor


                  Nothing remains to be said.

                  My last post was aimed at Darmstadt the Dadaist
                  Hard Brexit now!
                  #prayfornodeal

                  Comment


                    #29
                    There are too many wacky theories from theoretical physicists: that there is an infinite number of universes and hence anything and everything can and will happen; that the universe is a hologram; that the universe started from a big bang with nothing before (whatever before means in that context); that the universe is constantly expanding, contracting, exploding, expanding and so on.

                    At the end of the day I find these theories as unsatisfying as the myths that lie at the heart of each religion. Once we know what happened 1 nanosecond after the universe began, then what? 1 hundredth of a nanosecond?

                    I wonder what dark matter and dark energy will turn out to be. I think they are remains of Threaded's half eaten meals. The mass would be about right. Maybe they should build a giant nose to sniff the far reaches of the universe to detect left over pie and curry sauce.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X