• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Be afraid, be very afraid

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Hear Hear

    Maybe they shoudl stop piloting schemes to pay children not to misbehave.

    Maybe they should consider why they have a metropolitan authority to control the Met when the home secretary and the mayor shoudl have that responsibility.

    Maybe they should stop wasting time passing bullsh1t bills thought parliament to try and achieve there own agenda.

    Maybe they should concentrate on streamlining the public service to make it more effective, and not that does not mean empty fist banging rhetoric, it actually means firing load of the useless c@nts that are not needed

    Maybe they should stop flirting with privatisation and actually either privatise or nationalise transport becuase they have created an expensive f£ckup which is less efficient and cr@pper than either alternative.

    Maybe they should simplifly tax regulation to encourage enterprise rather than trying to stifle it.

    Maybe they should stop trying to tell everybody what do do and how to live, and concentrate on what they supposed to do, and thats run the country efficiently.

    Maybe they should at least set a precedent on ministerial conduct instead of fostering a culture of corruption and non-accountablity.


    Maybe then they may find the money to plug the pensions deficit.
    There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by sunnysan
      Maybe they shoudl stop piloting schemes to pay children not to misbehave.
      But these children have to get this money, so they can save it for the expensive holidays in term time (That there parents can't afford) Thus prventing there parents from becoming criminals for taking them abroad during term time!!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by benn0



        Rose tinted spectacles. Wonderful things.
        You do hear what your saying dont you?

        Where you wearing the same Rose tints when Maggie rode rough over this country? War with the Argies eh? Stamping out Industry in this country.(And I'm not a Labour boy)...My point is we can all take this attitude towards our parental political bulltulip that we are fed....you only sound like a Man united fan slagging off a Leeds fan to me!!

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by benn0
          I'm not spinning it as anything.

          For poverty, unemployment and crime, look no further than the state the country was in in the mid 80s.

          Oh yes, that was labour's fault as well wasn't it?

          .
          It most certainly was labours. If you remember thanks to socialism the IMF had to be brought in to rescue the economy in the mid 1970s. Thatcher carried out the reforms that were necessary to free vital services from the clutches of the Unions and to similarly free private enterprise to be able to compete and stand on its own two feet in a global economy.

          Unfortunately the economy had to go through some serious blood letting because people like you ignored what was really happening to the economy.

          History is repeating itself and there may not be a Thatcher to sort the problems out the next time.
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by DodgyAgent
            Unfortunately the economy had to go through some serious blood letting
            I believe that's gone out of fashion in medicine. Is it still in, in economics?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by DodgyAgent
              It most certainly was labours. If you remember thanks to socialism the IMF had to be brought in to rescue the economy in the mid 1970s. Thatcher carried out the reforms that were necessary to free vital services from the clutches of the Unions and to similarly free private enterprise to be able to compete and stand on its own two feet in a global economy.

              Unfortunately the economy had to go through some serious blood letting because people like you ignored what was really happening to the economy.

              History is repeating itself and there may not be a Thatcher to sort the problems out the next time.
              We're all doomed then - So why not **** of now it's so bad here?

              Comment


                #27
                My plan exactly.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by benn0
                  We're all doomed then - So why not **** of now it's so bad here?
                  Could see all this tulip coming so I have, oh yes, I have.
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by benn0
                    We're all doomed then - So why not **** of now it's so bad here?
                    I have already done it. Is that the best you can do?
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by benn0
                      For poverty, unemployment and crime, look no further than the state the country was in in the mid 80s.
                      Try the late 70's that was down to Labour as they were in the power at the time. Oh indeed there were problems in the 80's but give the correction's required to correct the structural problems that was a inevitable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X