Climate Research

[TimberWolf]

You really are a laughing stock of an ignorant buffoon.
In a previous post you criticise GW science saying it based on "models and theories", not realising that all science is based on models and theories.
Why don't you come back when you've educated yourself in a basic way on what science really is.
I recommend Popper and Kuhn for that purpose, if the words aren't too long for you.

Fail. Philosophy is bollocks. If you want to know what science thinks about philosophy, try reading Feynman.

[DimPrawn]

Popper and Kuhn




Propper Kunt

[sasguru]

Fail. Philosophy is bollocks. If you want to know what science thinks about philosophy, try reading Feynman.

Thanks for that considered input.
PS I have read Feynman - his is one point of view.

[sasguru]

Popper and Kuhn




Propper Kunt

I like your new sign off. At least you're honest.

[DimPrawn]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-party-s-over/

[DimPrawn]

Rex Murphy: Cancun sun speeds decay of global warming charade | Full Comment | National Post

[DimPrawn]

Climate change: Met Office halves 'worst case' sea level prediction - Telegraph

[sasguru]

PRUDEN: Turn out the lights, the party's over - Washington Times

Is it because you're really, really stupid that you think op-ed pieces in partisan newspapers constitute evidence?
Just curious.

[DimPrawn]

Is it because you're really, really stupid that you think op-ed pieces in partisan newspapers constitute evidence?
Just curious.

You think no statistically significant warming for 15 years, whilst CO2 levels are the highest for 600,000 years constitute evidence?

[kandr]

Fail. Philosophy is bollocks. If you want to know what science thinks about philosophy, try reading Feynman.

That is perhaps the stupidest post I have ever seen on these forums, or maybe anywhere.

What Science thinks?, so by reading one Scientists viewpoint on Philosophy that encapsulates all of Science.