• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Breaking news; Trainee accountants even more bored than IT people!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Come on guys! This is very demeaning to women, especially professional women who want to be taken from behind in the printer room.
    ftfy
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      number 7 and the last one?
      No, number 2. Second top left.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
        How shallow.

        2,1,5,2, 3,4,3,4 (out of 10)
        You didn't move on to page 2...

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
          Come on guys! This is very demeaning to women, especially professional women who want to be taken seriously in the business world.
          No you are right DP, its whats inside that counts, their character. If they have a pair of big knockers its a bonus.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
            You didn't move on to page 2...
            Yikes! They are much improved on page 2: 7,5,8 (need to check out her arse, she may be a 9) 7,2

            Comment


              #16
              One thing I would like to point out to moral-high-ground HR person: based on this showing, your intake is rather um...err...ethnically consistent.
              Last edited by thunderlizard; 11 November 2010, 13:59. Reason: got the HR person's gender wrong

              Comment


                #17
                The e-mail adresses of the guys who organised this are all here, so perhaps we should sent them our scoring?
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #18
                  The only people complaining about this are the birds not included in the list, the ones included will be well chuffed they are regarded as hotties, they guys wont complain. so the unattractive women will be the only ones.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by kandr View Post
                    The only people complaining about this are the birds not included in the list, the ones included will be well chuffed they are regarded as hotties, they guys wont complain. so the unattractive women will be the only ones.
                    All the tubby ones you mean?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
                      One thing I would like to point out to Mr moral-high-ground HR man: based on this showing, your intake is rather um...err...ethnically consistent.
                      I thought this. Obviously a man doing the hiring and he likes a particular type.

                      I once worked at a client where almost every woman hired in the last 5 years was a young slim blonde. Funny that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X