• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

sasguru hits mainstream press

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Augustus and Nero

    I meant Augustus lived in a modest house and left Rome with a unified government and military and the foundations for empire to replace the squabbling triumvirate system that he'd started with. While Nero built himself a massive palace and the state immediately fell to bits after he'd gone.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
      I meant Augustus lived in a modest house and left Rome with a unified government and military and the foundations for empire to replace the squabbling triumvirate system that he'd started with. While Nero built himself a massive palace and the state immediately fell to bits after he'd gone.
      On that I would agree. But we have to be careful with Nero, the building of his Domus Aurea could also be seen as a way of providing work for the unemployed after the great fire destroyed much of it. Also him being the last of the Julian/Claudian clan to be emperor he had to be vilified to atone for the spilling of imperial blood. There is some scholars who think the christians did set fire to Rome to hasten the end of the world and so the second coming of christ. At that time his was expected to come again within Peters lifetime.
      But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

      Comment


        #23
        Rome already had its best days behind it when Nero came to power.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          Rome already had its best days behind it when Nero came to power.
          Although many would argue that it was betwwen Nerva and Marcus Aurelius.
          But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

          Comment


            #25
            Nero was certainly a populist as well as an egomaniac (a bit of a Mugabe figure in some ways) & it would kind of fit if he'd had his palace built as a job creation scheme.

            I've never heard that particular conspiracy theory for the fire before - I suppose they'd be the Roman Christians that St Paul was writing to. You can tell they were hard liners from the tone of the opening couple of chapters. Plus this was before the Gospels were finalised, so lots of room to speculate on their theological position.

            Comment

            Working...
            X