Considering the very short careers of athletes this really is crap isn't it?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I dont think even Bolt will change the Tax!
Collapse
X
-
McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error." -
Originally posted by ads1980 View PostThat is an interesting point. So, who fancies approaching all these foreign sports stars and acting as "no win, no fee" challenge against the government!?
Really stupid piece of legislation. An athlete like Bolt works through agents in the countries where he runs; the agents' companies pay tax on the revenues and fees, so HM government would be minting it if he turns up, even without him paying any tax personally. With this construction, he just won't turn up, so revenues will be down.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThe government are waiving the rule for the 2011 uefa cup final, so might still waive it for the Olympics.
I would have thought that it would be a condition of bidding for the Olympics means you agree not to tax the competitors.Comment
-
Originally posted by centurian View PostGiven that the Olympics is on an "amateur" basis (i.e. no payments), so doesn't form part of his "occupation", it would be harder to justify including it - not that that has ever stopped HMRC though.
I would have thought that it would be a condition of bidding for the Olympics means you agree not to tax the competitors.
Thing is, in the past they'd have done this by time, i.e. spend one day in the UK and you pay on 1/365 of your total income. But now they've changed it to number of competitive events, so if he runs 10 meets per year, he'll pay tax on 1/10 of his income.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 13 July 2010, 11:36.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Can't really blame Labour anymore now. Or can we?McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostThis is plainly ridiculous. Imagine applying to contractors. You do a 9 monther in Germany and a 1 monther in England. We want to tax half your earnings!
Stupidly thought out.
The legislation is that you are taxed on the amount of money you earn while you are in the UK. Simples.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment