• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Football fans, an uninformed opinion for you

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    You lot should read the book "Why England Lose" by Simon Kuper et. al.
    It does say that one of the reasons for the poor showing of the footy team over the years is that it is traditionally a working class game and has been run by thickos.
    Why read it? Your eloquent synopsis seems to tell us all we need to know!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Platypus View Post
      Why read it? Your eloquent synopsis seems to tell us all we need to know!
      Well you need to know the other reasons. Its actually the best analysis I've seen that relies on data rather opinion.
      And it has some surprising conclusions.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
        Maybe if English parents got off their backsides and instead of watching the sport on the flatscreen actually went out and did it with their kids then there wouldn't be this dearth of good English sportspeople (not everyone in the UK is like that I'll admit but many are.)
        You're right that kids sports are managed by the clubs in Germany, as in Holland, and not by the schools, but they are there and well organised and provided for. There also seems to be a voluntary work ethic here in Holland which means parents get involved in running and financing their local sports clubs.

        However, there isn't a dearth of sporting talent in England; rugby, rowing, cricket, athletics and track cycling prove that.

        There's plenty of talent; it just doesn't play football.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #14
          My penny’s worth is:

          Not just football but it goes for most of UK talent, people to not want to work hard in order to be successful and overpaying them gives them even less incentive to be successful. People want to become stars overnight but without the hard work. I think the England players spend too much time at nightclubs and not enough time pushing themselves training. The Ghana team are totally opposite and are fantastic athletes
          "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Paddy View Post
            My penny’s worth is:

            Not just football but it goes for most of UK talent, people to not want to work hard in order to be successful and overpaying them gives them even less incentive to be successful. People want to become stars overnight but without the hard work. I think the England players spend too much time at nightclubs and not enough time pushing themselves training. The Ghana team are totally opposite and are fantastic athletes
            Have you ever seen rowers in training? They might disagree. But then, they can’t really be doing it for the money. Go and see how senior club (all the top 5 national divisions) rugby players train; blood, sweat and effort, then some more blood, sweat and effort. Been there and done it and have the scars to prove it, but never became a ‘star’; it wasn’t about becoming a ‘star’ or earning lots of money, but about being as good as you can be and helping the team win. Rowers, athletes, speed skaters and track cyclists regularly row, run or ride until they collapse in a heap. Watch the old programmes of Steve Redgrave on a rowing machine or Kelly Holmes doing yet another gutbusting 500 metre sprint on the training track after she’d heaved her guts out and you’ll see that at a high level of sport, a hard training session means you only open your mouth to breathe, to quickly gulp some water, or to puke, and you need to be physically helped to get yourself to the changing room. I spent a summer training at my local athletics club with this guy, who lives nearby me; Erben Wennemars - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia That man is a beast in training. Once we had a session of running 400 metres at a time as fast as we could, pulling a car tyre loaded with two shot put shots. After two runs with a short break and a number of shorter sprints, both of us were vomiting next to the athletics track. Someone came along and told us we were completely mad and needed our heads examining. I said I was feeling a bit knackered but would be OK. Erben said ‘right, now we’ve got rid of breakfast let’s do another two runs’. And we did, and we vomited again. The next year, I got my one and only rugby cap for Holland, and he did rather better, winning bronze in the world sprint championships. Training sessions like that weren’t intended to train the body, but to train the mind to overcome pain. No amount of money will motivate a person to go through that kind of pain; just a desire to be the best that you possibly can be.

            But yes, maybe this is part of the trouble with English football. To have a squad of 20-odd sportspeople who can win a world championship in any sport, you need thousands more who will sweat and suffer pain week in, week out, for years, just providing competition for the most talented, while accepting they won't make it themselves.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by sasguru View Post
              You lot should read the book "Why England Lose" by Simon Kuper et. al.
              It does say that one of the reasons for the poor showing of the footy team over the years is that it is traditionally a working class game and has been run by thickos.
              Why do you say "et. al."?

              There are only two authors, why not attribute the book to both by name?

              If you were really "heducated" then you'd be aware that "et al" is appropriate to three or more authors.

              Also, drop the "." after "et", it just makes you look like a moron.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                Why do you say "et. al."?

                There are only two authors, why not attribute the book to both by name?

                If you were really "heducated" then you'd be aware that "et al" is appropriate to three or more authors.

                Also, drop the "." after "et", it just makes you look like a moron.
                It appears the dog is correct.

                Looky here

                The abbreviation etc. (from the full form et cetera) came into English from the Latin expression et cetera ("and the rest"). Do not use etc. as a substitute for the adverb et al., which came into English from another Latin expression, et alii ("and others"). Use etc. when you list some, or a few, of many items, as in We will discuss the Plymouth Colony, the Puritans, the witchcraft trials, etc., in our early American literature seminar. (Never write "and etc." or "& etc.", as these are redundant.) Use et al. when you mention one person or a few people out of several or many, as in bibliographies, footnotes, or textual references: In the October issue of the medical journal, Smith, Jones, Roe, Doe, et al., [not etc.] discuss correct insertion of artificial airways.
                Encarta ® World English Dictionary
                answers.yahoo.com IS the law.
                Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  What about putting into every professional player’s contract a requirement to put a certain number of hours each month into coaching young local kids on the club’s pitches?
                  Don't footballers do that as part of their community service they regularly seem to get these days?
                  Older and ...well, just older!!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                    Don't footballers do that as part of their community service they regularly seem to get these days?
                    good one
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                      Why do you say "et. al."?

                      There are only two authors, why not attribute the book to both by name?

                      If you were really "heducated" then you'd be aware that "et al" is appropriate to three or more authors.

                      Also, drop the "." after "et", it just makes you look like a moron.
                      Forgot if there was one or more co-author(s) and who they were.
                      And your post makes you sound like the sort of uneducated pedant who nit picks because the 2 gigantic chips on his shoulders have been unbalanced (again).

                      Hard Brexit now!
                      #prayfornodeal

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X