Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Depending on how it is implemented this could be a good move. Right from the start they mentioned moving the emphasis off the South East, which after 30 years of centralisation there could be a Good Thing.
The devil will be in the detail of course.
Yep. the devil will be in the detail. It probably won't be structured for 1 man companies to
take advantage of....
Sounds like something right out of nuLieBore's playbook - announce something to capture the headlines, but in practise does not exist.
A year after it starts it will be rare to find any companies that qualify or have managed to benefit from the scheme.
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
A year after it starts it will be rare to find any companies that qualify or have managed to benefit from the scheme.
This brings back memories of regional development grants in the '80s. Light manufacturing only and with some you were expected to take on someone who been unemployed for more than 6 months.
Another memory from that era - a fellow contractor with his own software house (4-5 employees) decided to give a YOPS lad or lass a chance. The first thing that happened was a visit from some Elf'n'Safety type assessing his premises to see if they were suitable for an employee. At least two billable days lost and lots of red tape later, he was beginning to wish he hadn't bothered.
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.
The former Labour government had already committed to a greater and faster reduction in the budget deficit than any British government in modern times. The coalition government wants to do more; to nearly eliminate a structural budget deficit of 8% of national output – some £116bn – in five years. Moreover, it wants spending cuts to take 80% of the load. No country has ever volunteered such austerity. It is as tough a package of retrenchment as the IMF imposed on Greece, a country on the brink of bankruptcy. It is twice as tough as the famously harsh measures Canada took between 1994 and 1997. It is three times tougher than Sweden's measures between 1993 and 1995. In British terms, it is immeasurably tougher than what we did after the IMF crisis in 1976 or after the ERM crisis in 1992.
Speaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on Twitter
Will Huton has been mostly wrong with his pseudo left wing economics ...
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Comment